ePub 版

we think Mr. Willis shows considerable cleverness; there is an elegance about his frivolity which lends a grace to the effort not otherwise belonging to it.


“ You may talk of love in a cottage,

And bowers of trellised vine,
Of nature bewitchingly simple,

And milkmaids half divine.
* * * * * * *
But give me a sly flirtation,

By the light of a chandelier,
With music to play in the pauses,

And nobody very near.
Or a seat on a silken sofa,

With a glass of pure old wine,
And mamma too blind to discover

The small white hand in mine.
Your love in a cottage is hungry,

Your vine is a nest for flies,
Your milkmaid shocks the graces,

And simplicity talks of pies.
* * * * * * *
True love is at home on a carpet, ;

And mightily likes his ease,
And true love has an eye for a dinner,

And starves beneath shady trees.
His wing is the fan of a lady,

His foot's an invisible thing,
And his arrow is tipped with a jewel,

And shot from a silver string."

These verses are highly characteristic of the writer's genius. Nature is pronounced somewhat vulgar and inconvenient, and the elegances of life are considered as the pure Ideal. But we mightily object to Mr. Willis's definition of elegance; the true elegance is the ideal of human nature ; the elegance of the fop is as far removed from this as are the poles asunder. The Arcadia of our poet very much depends upon the upholsterer, the milliner, and the jeweller. His nature is artificial, and, instead of grassy meads, with heaven's dew glistening on them, they are covered with Turkey carpets ; the shady banks are removed, and velvet couches placed in their stead; the murmuring brooks are muffled, and the birds driven away to make room for an Italian Opera. This may be civilization in a very high degree, but it is not the natural elegance of man; one of the old dramatists has admirably touched upon the Ideal and the Conventional in those celebrated lines alluding to our Saviour, as,

“ The first true gentleman that e'er wore

Earth about him.”

We may mention as a singular proof of the artificiality of Mr. Willis's style, the curious fact that his bantering or mockheroic verses are scarcely distinguishable from his scriptural poems. We give part of “The Declaration” as evidence of our statement.

“'T was late, and the gay company was gone,

And light lay soft on the deserted room
From alabaster vases, and a scent
Of orange leaves and sweet verbena came

Through the unshuttered window on the air,
And the rich pictures, with their dark old tints,
Hung like a twilight landscape, and all things
Seemed hushed into a slumber. Isabel,
The dark-eyed, spiritual Isabel,
Was leaning on her harp, and I had stayed
To whisper what I could not, when the crowd
Hung on her look like worshippers
* * * *

She upraised
Her forehead from its resting place, and looked
Earnestly on me. She had been asleep.".

This is very heavy trifling.

But the chief test of how far Mr. Willis is a humorous writer is to be decided by his “ Lady Jane, a Humorous Novel in Rhyme.” Here there can be no mistake in the matter. He himself avows boldly his deliberate and determined intention to be funny. It is not left in doubt, as was the intention of the farce which was performed some time since at Burton's Theatre. After a few nights it was withdrawn by the author, who declared that the actors and audience had certainly mistaken the nature of the piece : he had intended it for a farce, but they had actually considered it as a serious drama. Had the author followed Mr. Willis's advice he would have prevented the dilemma.

To return to the humorous novel in verse. The following description of the heroine is very felicitous :

“ Yet there was fire within her soft grey eye,

And room for pressure on her lips of rose;
And few who saw her gracefully move by,

Imagined that her feelings slept, or froze.
You may have seen a cunning florist tie

A thread about a bud, which never blows,
But with shut chalice from the sun and rain,
Hoards up the morn—and such was Lady Jane.

Some stanzas back we left the ladies going

At six to dress for dinner. Time to dine
I always give in poetry, well knowing

That to jump over it in half a line,
Looks (let us be sincere, dear Muse) like showing

Contempt we do not feel for meat and wine.
Dinner! ye gods !—What is there more respectable ?

For eating, who, save Byron, ever checked a belle ?" We have read this poem through, consisting of two or three hundred verses in the Boccaccian or Don Juan stanza, but with the exception of an occasional play upon words, we do not recognise any of those strokes of humor and unexpected contrasts which render Byron so charming. Still there are a pleasant banter and gentlemanly quizzing about many of the best stanzas, which enable a reader to get through it. There are, however, few passages which will repay a second perusal.

We do not charge this upon Mr. Willis as a fault, because his forte is evidently prose, where his vivacity and polished style serve him admirably. His want of earnestness is fatal to him as a poet, but helps him in those lighter sketches where he seems quite at home.

We have no space to consider Mr. Willis as a dramatist ; we must therefore content ourselves by remarking that, as his plays have not retained possession of the stage, he adds one more to that long list of writers who have been seduced by the temptation of popular applause to over-estimate their powers. We may be permitted to add, that the total absence of dramatic power in his writings is so marked, that we should have been more astonished at success than failure : we consequently merely chronicle his attempt rather as a biographical fact than as a poetical feat.

There are few things more anomalous in the history of literature than the present position of the American stage. Out of eight theatres in the metropolis of the western world seven are owned by foreigners, the only exception being the small and somewhat inferior one called the National, in Chatham street, under the control of Mr. Chanfrau. We are informed that it is almost impossible for an American to get a play produced, however adapted it may be for popular representation. We are perfectly aware that many will allege the want of dramatic genius as a sufficient and conclusive reason for this singular state of things; but we may be allowed to observe that so long as this excluding or prohibiting system exists, there never will be any genius shown in this branch of poetry : encouragement is essentially necessary for every product, and for none more than for intellectual variety...

There is, perhaps, nothing more indicative of a healthy national state than a legitimate drama, and the greatest critics in England have thought that to this species of excellence England owes more than to her victorious fleets. It certainly reflects more of a country's glory than any other shape of mind, and a glance at the past will confirm this view.

The victories of Greece have died away. Marathon is only

« 上一頁繼續 »