difficult to conceive the course which a person who has been able, thus cunningly and cleverly, to mask, from the eyes of a section of the jury, all evidence of his mental derangement, might be induced to take after being so liberated, and to what extent the interests of his family would be fatally imperilled and involved by his testamentary, as well as other acts, executed under the combined influence of legally undetected insanity, and natural anger, directed towards those who, influenced by the kindest and most honourable motives, have incurred his severe displeasure by initiating proceedings in the Court of Chancery, with a view of enforcing (for the man's own advantage,) a statute of lunacy against him. It would be useless, if the claims of relationship were to be ignored in a will, made soon after the execution of the commission, by a person smarting under what he conceives to be an unjust imputation of insanity, to dispute its validity upon the death of the testator. If such an attempt were made, by raising the plea of testamentary incapacity, the verdict of sanity recorded by the jury at the Commission of Lunacy would, except in extreme and exceptional cases, be viewed as valid and conclusive evidence in favour of the will. Thus, misery and destitution of the acutest kind, would be entailed on the surviving relatives of the unhappy man, by their inability to upset a disposition of property clearly made when the testator was manifestly incapable of exercising a sane memory, judgment, and reflection.

I would point out another anomaly in reference to the state of the law as well as to the condition of public opinion in relation to this interesting subject. A man commits a murder. He is tried for the crime. The plea of insanity is raised in his defence, upon what is conceived to be bonâ fide evidence of the existence of mental derangement at the time of the murder. The

attempt thus made to protect the criminal, immediately rouses the public indignation. Such an excuse is not in many instances listened to, and the unfortunate medical witnesses who have been called upon to exercise an important, and often thankless duty in support of the plea, are exposed, for giving an honest expression of opinion, to the most unmeasured ridicule, and vituperation. In defending the memory of the suicide from the disgrace that would accompany a verdict of felo de se, the evidence of the medical man proving insanity is regarded with great respect and treated with profound deference; but in the effort to rescue a poor lunatic from the agonies of a painful death upon the scaffold, on evidence much stronger than was adduced before the previously mentioned court, the expert is exposed to unmitigated abuse. Instead of being considered as an angel of mercy, engaged in the exercise of a holy and righteous mission, he is viewed with suspicion, and often treated with contumely, as if he were attempting to sacrifice, instead of to save human life. Again, the attempt to prove sanity of mind and mental capacity at a Commission of Lunacy, with the object of preserving intact the liberty of the subject and establishing his right to an unfettered management of his own property, is applauded to the very echo; but the endeavour to excuse, on the plea of insanity, an act of crime consigning the unhappy wretch, alleged to be an irresponsible lunatic, to penal servitude for life, or, alas! to the hands of the public executioner, is denounced in unqualified language, as a most monstrous, unjustifiable, and iniquitous interference with the course of justice. The excuse of insanity will not, in many cases, under these circumstances, be tolerated by a portion of the press, in the slightest degree countenanced by the judge who tries the criminal, or deferred. to by the jury, whose duty it is to decide the fate of the

prisoner. The public mind is violently shocked at the commission of a horrible and brutal murder. The act is viewed in the abstract as one of great and barbarous atrocity, apart altogether from all its concomitant extenuating medico-psychological considerations. The cry is raised for "vengeance!" The shout is," an eye for an eye!"-"a tooth for a tooth!"-" blood for blood!"; forgetting, in the paroxysm of indignant emotion, and frenzy of excited feeling, engendered by the contemplation of a dreadful violation of the majesty of the law, that JUSTICE must ever be tempered with that DIVINE MERCY which sanctifies and enshrines

"The throned monarch better than his crown,

And is the Attribute of God Himself."

CHAPTER VII.

The Stage of Consciousness.

Ir we were to closely scrutinize into the fathomless mysteries of the inner mental life, and fearlessly analyse the nature of the terrible conceptions, that occasionally throw their dark phantasmal shade across the anxious and troubled breast, what a melancholy, degrading, and profoundly humiliating revelation most men would have to make, of the dark corners, secret recesses, and hidden crevices of the human heart! If this self-examination were faithfully, and honestly executed, it would cause the best and fairest of God's creatures to shudder with terror at the possibility of such ideas ever intruding into the soul's solemn sanctuary.*

A neglect of the practice of self-inspection and self-interrogation, is said to be one of the most serious imperfections, moral and intellectual, of the present system of mental discipline, and education. The defect is not confined, it is alleged, to listless, vacant persons, who permit life to glide over them amidst frivolities, and waking dreams, but is perceived among those who intensely, and actively, employ themselves with objects external to themselves. An able moral philosopher observes, when alluding to this subject: "that, after a certain period of life, few have the hardihood sternly to look within. For a high degree of moral courage is required to face the disclosure which awaits the mind, when it is thus turned inwards upon itself; a disclosure, it may be, of the result of years and years that have passed over it in listless inactivity, which yields nothing to reflection but an empty void; or in the eager pursuit of objects which are seen to be worthless; or in the acquirement of habits which are felt to be destructive of the health of the mind; the disclosure, it may be, of important duties neglected, and important pursuits overlooked, and the conviction that life is drawing to a close, while its great business is yet to begin. Few have moral courage to meet this disclosure; and, when it is met with an attention in some degree adequate to its supreme interest, the impressions which it yields are encountered by the force of confirmed moral habits, which seem to claim every faculty and feeling of the mind as theirs by hopeless bondage. Hence the supreme importance of cultivating in early life the habit of looking

Q

Moral philosophers, intimately acquainted with the anatomy of the human heart, have often asked, who has not, occasionally, had a demon pursuing with remorseless impetuosity his every footstep, suggesting to his ever active, and often morbidly disturbed and perverted imagination, the commission of some dark deed of crime, from the contemplation of which he has at the time shrunk back aghast with horror? What mind is alleged to be so pure and untainted, that has not been disposed to yield, when the reason and moral sense have, alas! been transiently paralyzed, and God's grace ceases to influence the heart, to the seduction of impure thought, lingered with apparent pleasure on the contemplation of physically unchaste images, or delighted in a fascinating dalliance with criminal thoughts? Who has not conceived how easily he might, with his own hand, "shuffle off this mortal coil," and penetrate into the dark and mysterious secrets of futurity? What heart has been, at all times, free from malevolent passion, revengeful emotion, lustful feeling, unnatural, and, alas! devilish impulses? Is not every bosom polluted by a dark, leprous spot, corroding ulcer, or portion of moral gangrene? Does there not cling to every mind some melancholy reminiscence of the past, which throws, at times, a sombre tinge over the chequered path of life? We may flatter our pharisaical vanity and human pride, by affirming that we are exempt from these melancholy conditions of moral suffering, and sad states of mental infirmity, but, alas! we should be belying human nature if we were to ignore the existence of such, thank God, only temporary, paroxysmal, and evanescent conditions within; the practice of rigidly questioning ourselves as to what we are, and what we are doing,-what are our leading pursuits, and what our mental habits; what are our plans and prospects for life, and what influence over the whole of our moral discipline have the solemn realities of a life which is to come."-Dr. Abercrombie on the " Culture and Discipline of the Mind."