ITT Harper, Div. of International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., Morton Grove. Sarkes Tarzain Inc., Bloomington & Jasper (also Brownsville, Tex.) Warner Gear Company, Muncie. Jay Garment Company, Portland. Frederick H. Burnham Glove, Michigan City. Albert Givens, East Chicago. Arthur Winer, Inc., Gary. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp., New Castle. Bethlehem Steel Corp., Laman Bolt Plant, East Chicago. The U.S. Shoe Corp., Columbus. Harris Corporation, Cleveland. OHIO International Harvester Co., Shadyside. Ford Motor Company, Walton Hills. Production Molded Plastic Inc., Alliance. The Lamson & Sessions Company, Cleveland. Hercules Trouser Co., Inc., Hillsboro. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., Youngstown. GTE Sylvania, Inc., Ottawa. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., Louisville. Advance Mfg. Corp., Cleveland. Dana Corporation, Spicer Transmission Division, Toledo. Republic Steel Corp., Union Drawn Division. Satralloy, Inc., Steubenville. PENNSYLVANIA Teplick Clothers, Inc., Philadelphia. Majestic Sweater Mills, Inc., Philadelphia. GTE Sylvania, Inc., Altoona. Universal-Cyclops Specialty Steel Company, Bridgeville. Teledyne Vasco, East Latrobe. GTE Sylvania, Inc., Emporium. Bristol Knitting Mills, Inc., Cornwells Heights. Jay Knitwear Inc., Philadelphia. Russell, Burdsall & Ward Inc., Corapolis. Rubber Corporation of Penn. Armco Steel Corporation, Butler Works, Steel Division, Butler. Jessop Steel Company, Washington. Carpenter Technology, Reading. Greenville Tub Corp., Greenville. Crucible Inc. Colt Industries, Midland. D. Seidman's Sons, Philadelphia. Washington Steel Corporation, Houston. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp., Breckenridge. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp., West Leechburg. Continental Copper, Lower Burrel. Norvelt Clothing Co., Inc., Norvelt. Empire Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc., Elizabethtown. Galeton Production Co., Galeton. Modulus Corporation, Mt. Pleasant. Teledyne Pittsburgh Tool Steel, Monaca. Bethlehem Steel Corp., Lebanon. MLM Sportswear Inc., Philadelphia. Bergman Tool Mfg. Co., Inc., Buffalo. Andrew Pallack & Co. Inc. and Bruce Ramsey Division, New York. Primo Coat Corp.. New York. Imperial Pants Co., Brooklyn. Hy-Grade Sportswear Co., Inc. & Hy-Grade Coat Co., Inc., New York. Eagle Pants Co., Brooklyn. Catania Clothing Corp.. New York. E. Bonelli & Co., Inc., New York. Brookfield Clothes Inc.. Long Island City. M. Kopp Inc., New York. Saint Laurie Limited, New York. Harry Irwin, Inc., New York, M'Sieur Slacks, Inc., Brooklyn. Weiss Marble Works, Inc., Brooklyn. Splendorform Brassiere Company, New York. Lady Marlene Inc., New York. Youthcraft Foundations Co., Brooklyn. Do-All Brassiere Co., Brooklyn. L & W Brassiere Co., Inc., New York. Dame Belt Company Inc., New York. Marshall Ray Corp., Troy. Ambroson Gloves Inc., Gloversville. Joseph Perrelia, Inc., Gloversville. General Electric Company, Liverpool. Cluett Peabody & Company, Inc., New York. Rud-Shaw Clothing Co., Inc., Brooklyn. Wallace Murphey Corp., Simmons Steel Div., Lockport. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Comp., Utica. Washburn Wire Co., New York. Excellent Bag Corp., Dirzis Products Co., Inc., Richmond Hill. NORTH CAROLINA Southern Screw Co., Statesville. SOUTH CAROLINA Manhattan Shirt Co., Winsboro. TENNESSEE Knoxville Glove Co., Knoxville. Jay Garment Co., Clarksville. Sarkes Tarzain Inc., Brownsville. (Also Bloomington & Indiana). Allen Bradley Co., Milwaukee. PUERTO RICO. Dynamic International Corporation, Lajas. Mr. VANIK. Thank you very much, Mr. Oswald. Yesterday, I addressed this question to Mr. Woodcock-yesterday we heard testimony from the steel workers on the bumping problem created by the narrow definition of adversely affected employment. They said it could be taken care of by the worker bumped. You are exactly on the same idea. Mr. OSWALD. Yes, sir. Mr. VANIK. Is their solution sufficient in your view or will it take some more legislative adjustment to merely take care of the worker who is ultimately displaced? Do you think that will take care of the whole problem? Mr. OSWALD. Does your question involve language change? Mr. VANIK. Yes. Mr. OSWALD. The way it has been interpreted by the Department of Labor in the past Mr. VANIK. They could do it by revision of their policy within the statute, couldn't they? Or do you feel that statutory remedies must be put in? Mr. DENISON. Mr. Chairman, it is our feeling generally in these areas where we see problems arising that perhaps the Labor Department would feel better, and we would feel better, if they settled with less than court involvement. Mr. VANIK. Mr. Steiger? Mr. VANIK. Mr. Frenzel? Mr. FRENZEL. No questions. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. VANIK. We know we have to try to make this program meaningful or it is going to have a completely adverse effect on our entire trade policy. I think I have heard some views expressed by your organization on limited market penetration. What is your undated thinking on that subject? Mr. OSWALD. That market penetration is a measure of the disruption that imports have on a particular industry. Mr. VANIK. Where do you think it should be fixed if that were applied as a doctrine? Mr. OSWALD. I think it has to be viewed in terms of the rapidity of change rather than an absolute number. In some industriesMr. VANIK. It would be a variable, you would say? Mr. OSWALD. It would be a variable, but it would be in accordance with the rapidity with which that has taken place. Mr. VANIK. You are concerned with the degree of acceleration of the import? Mr. OSWALD. The degree of acceleration and the losses of American capability to produce certain goods and products. For example, in the color television industry the increase in 1 year was from approximately 20 percent of production to about 47 percent of production in 1 year. It had tremendous disruptive impact on that industry. |