Shakespeare's Tragic Skepticism
Yale University Press, 2008年10月1日 - 304 頁
Readers of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies have long noted the absence of readily explainable motivations for some of Shakespeare’s greatest characters: why does Hamlet delay his revenge for so long? Why does King Lear choose to renounce his power? Why is Othello so vulnerable to Iago’s malice? But while many critics have chosen to overlook these omissions or explain them away, Millicent Bell demonstrates that they are essential elements of Shakespeare’s philosophy of doubt. Examining the major tragedies, Millicent Bell reveals the persistent strain of philosophical skepticism. Like his contemporary, Montaigne, Shakespeare repeatedly calls attention to the essential unknowability of our world.
In a period of social, political, and religious upheaval, uncertainty hovered over matters great and small—the succession of the crown, the death of loved ones from plague, the failure of a harvest. Tumultuous social conditions raised ultimate questions for Shakespeare, Bell argues, and ultimately provoked in him a skepticism which casts shadows of existential doubt over his greatest masterpieces.
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
Shakespeare's tragic skepticism用戶評語 - Not Available - Book Verdict
Although chiefly a specialist in American literature who has authored books on J.P. Marquand and Henry James and has edited the Library of America edition of Nathaniel Hawthorne's novels, Bell ... 閱讀評論全文
actor Antony and Cleopatra Antony’s appears asks audience Banquo blood Brutus Brutus’s called Cassio cause character Claudius Cordelia crime daughters death deed Desdemona diﬀerent doubt Duncan Edgar Edmund eﬀect eﬀort Emilia expressed false father feel ﬁgure ﬁnal ﬁnally ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁt Florio Folio Fortinbras ghost Gloucester Gloucester’s Goneril Hamlet hath hero’s Holinshed Horatio human husband Iago Iago’s idea identiﬁed identity imagination inﬂuence jealousy Julius Caesar Kent killed King Lear king’s Lady Macbeth Laertes Lear’s Macduﬀ Machiavellian madness meaning mind Montaigne Montaigne’s murder nature never observed oﬀ oﬀers ofthe one’s Ophelia Othello philosophic skepticism play’s playwright plot Plutarch Polonius Quarto reference reﬂects Regan reminds revenge role royal says scene seems selfhood sense Shake Shakespeare Shakespeare’s play signiﬁcant skepticism social soliloquy speare’s speciﬁc stage story suﬀering suggested tells theater theatrical things thou thought tion tragedy tragic truth witchcraft witches word