No Guarantee of a Gun: How and Why the Second Amendment Means Exactly What It SaysAuthor House, 2009年12月3日 - 768 頁 The information in this book proves by means of credible and irrefutable documentary evidence that the Supreme Court's decision on June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, which held that the Second Amendment protects the right of an individual to possess and carry weapons, was incorrect. And the information in this book forms the foundation of what would have been the correct decision in that case. Second Amendment commentary and case law are incorrect. But unfortunately, they are relied upon by today's scholars and jurists. However, this book, written in plain English instead of the legalese that many persons find unappealing about books pertaining to legal subjects, takes the bold step of disproving these incorrect authorities on the most controversial and puzzling provision of the United States Constitution, and it meets that challenge. While other books on the Second Amendment rely largely on incorrect commentary and case law, this book uses credible and irrefutable documentary evidence to uncover the substance of the Second Amendment. By proving that Second Amendment commentary and case law are incorrect, this book will become both the preeminent treatise on the Second Amendment and a landmark book in the field of Constitutional law. And while gun control has been a highly controversial issue for a long time, the debate on gun control has been improperly bifurcated into what is good public policy and what is Constitutional. This book eliminates the Constitutional component of that debate so that the debate can be focused solely on what is good public policy. Other books written on the Second Amendment propose incorrect theories or attempt to reconcile its two supposed clauses. However, this book is the best book ever written on the Second Amendment because it does what no other book has ever done. It uncovers, by means of documentary evidence instead of mere argument, the true meanings of the terms A well regulated Militia, people, keep, and bear arms. |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 5 筆結果,共 75 筆
... provision of the Constitution, it is incumbent upon us to do the proper research in order to resolve the uncertainties. And again, it does not suffice to give a particular meaning to a Constitutional provision simply to serve interests ...
... provisions of the Bill of Rights. [350: p. 76] But as we will see, proper research reveals that these issues are not ... provision. Massachusetts' Elbridge Gerry did comment briefly on the crucial role of the militia in preventing the ...
... provision was primarily advanced by the Radical movement, particularly in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Only after the Constitution had received its crucial ninth ratification were the two precepts joined into a single sentence ...
... provision, including some provisions that referred only to a common defense purpose, recognized an individual right to possess at least militiatype arms. [f] [300: p. 244] INDIVIDUAL RIGHT IN A MILITARY CONTEXT Another theory holds that ...
... provision in question applies only to the right to bear arms as a member of the state militia, or some other military organization provided for by law, is also apparent from the second amendment to the federal Constitution, which says ...
內容
43 | |
PART III TYING UP LOOSE ENDS OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT | 551 |
PART IV THE SECOND AMENDMENT VIOLATION AND CLAIM | 699 |
Back Cover | 761 |