v. Massan Farrar v. Green Wilson v. de Coulon Minton, Hollins and Co. v. Re Brown (deceased)- Lord Lovat v. Leslie Riddell v. Dodds Tamplin v. James Lesy v. Darnton Re Teall (deceased) French v. Andrews Oliver v. Oliver Garbatt v. Watson Hamilton v. Hamilton Davies v. Phillips West v. Davies Nicholson v. Vestry of Mile End Old Town Small v. Chamberlain Chamberlain v. Small Thomson, Wylie and Co. v. Saxby Massam v. Thorley's Food for Cattle Co. Norton v. Mansel Bunbury v. Gardner Bingham v. Bingham Broad v. Chapman Re Nicholson-Dobson v. Nicholson Re Laurence (deceased)Bertram v. Wayth Bell v. Dent Sutcliffe . Sutcliffe Morton v. Warren Re Turner (deceased)- De Bergne. De Bergne Re Gardner (deceased)- Re Crome (deceased)-Col- . Paris, Skating Re Williams (deceased)- Aldridge v. Reed Brown v. Perry Partridge v. Baylis (Befo V.C. BACON.) Causes. (Before V.C. HALL.) Republic of Peru v. Ruzo Surtees v. Malet Clements v. Norris Fox v. Foster Utley v. Turney Catling v. King Spraggon v. Spraggon Re Ollerhead (deceased)- Re M Mullan (deceased)- Smith (deceased) - Cordrey v. Mode of Re Smith Mathew Mathew v. Hesketh v. The Bolton Venot v. Warrington King v. Cocke Graham v. Jones The London Syndicate Re Mary Hammant (deceased)-Lett v. Hammant Cook r. Fearn Re Smith (deceased)-Hill ↑ Abbotts Jackson v. Curteis Wegmann v. Corcoran, Witt, and Company Lofts v. Foster Re Pepperell (deceased)Pepperell v. Chamberlain Cottee v. Jones Liddell v. Newall Vanderzee v. Lennard Bastard v. Smith Bernau v. Fortnum and Co. Goode and Co. v. Denton Re Butler (deceased)- Duke of Westminster v. Great Western Iron Com pany. Benton Pickering v. Mellor Johnson v. Burges Robinson v. Winter Merchant Banking Co. v. Kenrick v. Kent Weatherhead v. Leath Shaw e. Brown Flood v. Pritchard Borrowman v. Mack Birmingham Canal Company . Cartwright Millward r. Burroughes The above list contains causes set down to Saturday, Oct. 26, inclusive. Queen's Bench Division. Fo Judgment. Hamilton v. Johnson Earl Manvers and another v. Bartholomew. Special case. (Two judges.) Spencer and another v. Slater and others. Special case. (Two judges.) Plant and Wife v. Peas and others. Demurrer Walker v. Walker and others. Special case. (Two judges.) In the matter of an Arbitration between H. E. P. Adamson and another and The Newcastle Steam Ship, &c. Association. Special case. (Two judges.) Leicester Water Works Co. and another v. The Assessment Committee of Barrow Union and others. Special case. (Two judges.) (Two Evans v. Reynish and others. Special case. ENLARGED RULES AND ORDERS. GLOUCESTERSHIRE-Reg.". Rev. E. F.Witts and another, ENGLAND-Reg. v. Margaret Lawrance In the Matter of Louis Barnett, gentleman, &c. Enlarged generally pending reference to the Master. CROWN PAPER. Reg. v. Bradlaugh APPEALS FROM INFERIOR Courts. Symington and Co. v. Bragg Rossiter v. Pike Paul and another v. Summerhayes Guardians of Barton Regis v. Clerk of the Peac fo Berks Williams v. Moore Aaronson v. Marcussen Thomas v. Roberts Stringer v. Sykes Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. London and Provincial Supply Association (Limited) Newling . Vestry of St. Giles, Camberwe Matthews v. Hill Tyso v. Pettit and another Reeve v. Stonham (To be heard before one judge.) Chamberlain (clerk) v. Barnewell (clerk) April 5. Stand over till issues in fact tried. Same v. Wallingford Turner v. Hopcraft and the Disinfector and Sanitary Works Co. APPEALS FROM INFERIOR COURTS. ■ MIDDLESEX-Lovell v. Newton and Newton GLAMORGANSHIRE-Re Companies Acts 1862 and 1867, and Industrial Provident Societies Act 1867, and Re Troedyrhiew and Cymmer Pioneer Industrial Society (Limited) NORTHAMPTONSHIRE-Whiteman v. Hawkins = CHESHIRE-Reddish v. Hitchenor SUSSEX-Markwick v. Denyor and Co. YORKSHIRE-Kirkwood v. Sheffield Loan and Invest- LONDON-Metchin v. Downing and others LANCASHIRE-Dixon and another v. Jones and another CARDIGAN-Griffiths v. Llanbadarnfawr School Board METROPOLITAN POLICE DISTRICT-Gadney v. Rough GLOUCESTER-The For Argument. Llantwit Rhos [Hawkins, J. Brett, L.J. [Brett, L.J. Coal Company (Limited) v. The Monmouthshire Railway and Canal [Quain, J. Company Transferred from Common Pleas Division. Stands over till after decision of House of Lords in "Monmouthshire Railway and Canal Company v. Bevan," YORK-M'Donough v. North-Eastern Railway Company [Pollock, B. Stands over till case in House of Lords "Slattery v. Dublin, &c., Railway Company" decided. MANCHESTER-Bottoms v. The Goyt Mill Company [Lopes, J. 24th June. Part heard before Lord Chief Baron and Baron Cleasby. DERBY-Ellis v. Kirby [Bramwell, L.J. 25th June. Part heard before Lord Chief Baron and Baron Pollock. LONDON-Mills v. Usborne MIDDLESEX-Robinson v. Bensberg [Grove, J. [Hawkins, J. Hawkins, J. Dodsworth and another v. Ridgway MIDDLESEX-Cotterell v. Owen MIDDLESEX Brothers GLOUCESTER-Goldstein v. Graham MIDDLESEX-Haycox v. Chetwynd STAFFORD-Maiden v. Miner Huddleston, B. [Baggallay, L.J. [Huddleston, B. [Denman, J. LONDON-London and St. Katherine Docks Company v. [Lord Coleridge Winstanley TAUNTON-Sampson v. The Somerset and Devon Rail[Sir J. Stephen, Q.C. way Company [Manisty, J. [Hawkins, J. LONDON-M'Quire v. Harvey; Harvey v. M'Quire MIDDLESEX-Brooks v. Nash SPECIAL PAPER. For Argument. [Field, J. Hopkin v. Taylor. Special case Trustees of Garstin v. Deane. Special case Part heard before Baron Pollock, Feb. 25. Fitzpatrick v. Banner. Special case Black and others v. Homersham. Special case Whiteley v. Backhouse. Demurrer to defence George Jinman and Co. v. East Coast Insurance Asso- Cooper v. Williams. Demurrer to claim APPEALS FROM INFERIOR COURTS. In the matter of T. Dutton (deceased) and ? incoln's-inn fields. To surrender at the Bankrupts' Court LOFTUS, JOHN HENRY, Mount-st, Grosvenor-sq. Pet. Oct. 23. Reg. Murray. Sol. Richards, Warwick-st, Regent-st. Sur Nov. 11 MERRIMAN, THOMAS, tie manufacturer, Noble-st, Falcon-sq. NICHOLSON, JOHN STUART, wholesale stationer, Kempsford- SMITH, WILLIAM, builder, Hanover-pl, Regent's-pk. Pet. VARNUM, JAMES, victualler, Great Suffolk-st, Borough. Pet. Oct. 21. Reg. Spring-Rice. Sols. Armstrong and Co, Old Jewry. Sur. Nov. 5 NATEBS, Rev. C. J., clerk in holy orders, Blyth. Pet. Oct. To surrender at the Bankrupt's Court, Lincoln's-inn-fields. HAYDON, WILLIAM JAMES, builder, Brixton-rd. Pet. Oct. 26. Reg. Brougham. Sur. Nov. 12 ENSOM, WILLIAM, grocer, Spital-st, Guildford. Pet. Oct. 21. Reg. Brougham, Sur. Nov. 12 ¡To surrender in the Country. HICKS, VALENTINE, grocer, Wivenhoe. Pet. Oct. 18. Reg. Barnes. Sur. Nov. 13 JACKS, ALFRED, provision broker, Liverpool. Pet. Oct. 24. Reg. Bellringer. Sur. Nov. 11 RIGBY, ROBERT, provision merchant, Liverpool. Pet. Oct. 21. Reg. Bellringer. Sur. Nov. 11 WRIGHT. EDWIN, tailor, Glossop. Pet. Oct. 24. Reg. Hall. BROOK, ARTHUR, tailor, Bradford. Pet. Oct. 24. Liquidations by Arrangement. FIRST MEETINGS. Reg. ALBANY, JOHN, and HILLARY, FREDERICK, fancy importers, Blackfriars-road. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 7, at two, at office of Sol. Waring, Borough High-st, Southwark ALLEN, SAMUEL, ironmonger, Banbury. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 2, at three, at the Reindeer inn, Parson's-st, Banbury. Sols. Pain and Hawtin, Banbury APPLEBY, WILLIAM, grocer, South Stockton. Pet. Oct. 22, Nov. 6, at eleven, at offices of the South Durham and North Yorkshire Wholesale Traders' Association, 116, High-st, Stockton ARMSTRONG, JOHN BUSHBY, builder, Alnwick. Pet. Oct. 21. BAMFORD, HENRY WHITE, gold watch case maker, King-sq, BENNISON, JOHN HENRY, accountant, Middlesbrough. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 2, at ten, at office of Sol. Wilkes, Middlesbrough BENTLEY, WILLIAM HENRY, greengrocer, Hanley. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 4, at three, at the Royal hotel, Crewe. Sol. Ashmall, Hanley BENTON, JOHN, jun., miller, Lichfield. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. S, at eleven, at offices of Sols. Barnes and Russell, Lichfield BEWLAY, WILLIAM JOHN, commercial traveller, Birmingham. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 3, at eight, at offices of Sols. Brown and Brown, Birmingham BLAND, WILLIAM, grocer, Thirsk. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 9, at eleven, at office of Sol. West, Thirsk BOND, WILLIAM DAVEY, baker, Bristol. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. BUGGINS, GEORGE, tailor, Banbury. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 7, CANDLER, RICHARD, livery-stable keeper, Westborough. CARRICK, WILLIAM, innkeeper, Haltwhistle. Pet. Oct. 22. CAWDRON, JOHN, farmer, Branston Fen. Pet. Oct. 92. Nov. COLES, FRANCIS EWENS, upholsterer, Amhurst-rd, Hackney. Pet. Oct. 16. Nov. 6, at three, at the Chamber of Commerce, Cheapside. Sol. Anning, Cheapside CONNARD, GEORGE MORLAND, painter, Oldham. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at three, at the Mitre hotel, Cathedral yd, Manchester. Sols. Blackburne, Smyth, and Fletcher, Oldham CORNBILL, JAMES BEVAN, plumber, Stow-on-the-Wold. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 20, at two, at office of Sol. Parker, Stowon-the-Wold COXON, WILLIAM TOWNSEND, silk agent, Nottingham. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 12, at twelve, at office of Sol. Belk, Nottingham CROFTS, JOHN, sen., farmer, Baxterley. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. DAVIES, WILLIAM, cotton waste dealer, Oldham. Pet. Oct. DOWN, GEORGE HENRY, shipbuilder, Cardiff. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 7, at three, at offices of the South Wales Merchants" Sol. Protection Association, 19, Duke-st, Cardiff. Stephens, Cardiff DUGMORE, WILLIAM JAMES ROBINSON, emery manufacturer, Balsall Heath. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at three, at offices of Sols. Buller and Bickley, Birmingham Pet. FAIRCLOUGH, THOMAS, Coal dealer, Birmingham. Oct. 22. Nov. 2, at eleven, at office of Sol. Burton, Birmingham FEEK, JOHN, baker, Ipswich, Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at eleven, at office of Sol. Mills, Ipswich FINCH, HENRY, out of business, Wigan. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 6, at eleven, at office of Sol. France, Wigan FRANCE, WILLIAM, joiner, Heckmondwike, Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at eleven, at office of Sol. Sykes, Heckmondwike FRANCIS, FREDERICK, builder, Bristol. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 5, at eleven, at office of Sol. Meeres, Bristol. FRANK, JULIUS, jeweller, Liverpool. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 5, at three, at office of Sol. Etty, Liverpool FRASER, WILLIAM MARROW SUTHERLAND, mining engineer. FRY, THOMAS, ironmonger, Arundel. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 7, GAMBLE, JOHN, wool dealer, Bradford. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. GILKES SAMUEL, paper stainer, the Triangle, Hackney. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 7, at two, at the offices of Gamble and Harvey, Gresham-bldngs, Basinghall-st. Sol. Lockyer, Gresham-bldngs, Guildhall GRATRIX, CHARLES FREDERICK, timber merchant, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 13, at three, at offices of Sols. Rylance and Barker, Manchester GRAY, JOSEPH WATKINS, ironmonger, Torquay. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at three, at the Craven hotel, Craven-st, Strand. Sol. Friend, Exeter GRIFFITHS, JONATHAN, GRIFFITHS, JOSEPH, and GRIFFITHS. Pet. HATCH, ROBERT, picker maker. Newton. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at two, at offices of Sols. Chew and Sons, Manchester HAWKSLEY, WILLIAM, grocer, Hull. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 4, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Walker and Spink, Hull HESSION, JOHN, fishmonger, Hanley. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 4. at eleven, at the Royal hotel, Crewe. Sol. Ashmall, Hanley HETHERINGTON, JAMES, builder, Eversley. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 6, at half-past twelve, at the Station hotel, Wokingham. Sol. Eve, Aldershot HODGE, RICHARD, farmer, Rushton. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 6, at ten, at offices of Sols. Trenchard and Trenchard, Taunton HOLLAND, WILLIAM, builder, Croydon. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 5, at three, at offices of Sols. Davis, Morgan, and Co, Coleman-st HORTON, WILLIAM, victualler, Bransford. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 7, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Corbett and Corbett, Worcester KEEPING, JAMES WILLIAM, builder, Winkton. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 13, at twelve, at office of Sols. Aldridge and Sharp, Bournemouth KENDALL, EPHRAIM HILL, farmer, Riseley. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 8, at eleven, at office of Sol. Jessop, Bedford KENYON, CHARLES, slater, Sheffield. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at eleven, at office of Sol. Porrett, Sheffield KING, JOSEPH HENRY, miller, Newtown Linford. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 7, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Fowler, Smith, and Warwick, Leicester KNIGHT, GEORGE BIRKBECK, lime manufacturer, Luton. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 12, at eleven, at the Red Lion inn, Castle-st, Luton, Sol. Neve, Luton KNOWLES, WILLIAM, grocer, Birmingham. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at three, at office of Sol. Jaques, Birmingham LEASON, THOMAS ROBERT, commission agent, Levenshulme. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 12, at three, at office of Sola. Boote and Edgar, Manchester LEE, JAMES, accountant, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 8, at three, at office of Sol. Harris, Manchester LEWIS, WILLIAM. and ADDIS, THOMAS, painters, Rochdale. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 9, at eleven, at office of Sols. Molesworth and Sen, Rochdale MARDON, HENRY, manager, Kingsland-green. Pet. Oct. 18. Nov. 11, at three. at office of Sol. McLachlan, Metrepolitan-chmbrs, Broad-st MATTHEW, THOMAS, and FAIRLIE, JOHN, merchants, Glasgow. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 20, at two, at offices of Harding, Whinney, and Co, 8, Old Jewry. Sols. Druce, Sons, and Jackson, Billiter-sq MAY, ALFRED HENRY, solicitor, Arbour-sq. Stepney. Pet. Oct. 8. Oct. 26, at two, at the Blue Posts hotel, 47, Southampton-bldgs, Chancery-la. Sol. Baldwin, Southamptonbldgs, Helborn MCCULLOUGH, SAMUEL, greengrocer, Liverpool. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 9, at twelve, at office of Sol. Culshaw, Liverpoo MCDONALD, ROBERT, plumber, Lower Broughton. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at eleven, at office of S. Garthwaite, Manchester MIDLEY, JOHN HENRY, grocer, Bradford. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 7, at half-past four, at offices of W. R. Burton, ecre tary and manager of the Bradford and Distric: Creditors' Association, 7, Parkinson-chmors. Market st, Bradford MILES, JOHN ALBERT, coach builder, Banbury. Pet. Oct. 2. Nov. 8, at twelve, at office of Sols. Kilby and Mace, Banbury MORGAN, THOMAS CHARLES, grocer, Swansea. Pet. Oct. 18. MORGAN, WILLIAM, grocer, Swansea. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 1, MULLINGER, CHARLES, carpenter, Park-rd, Teddington. NICHOLSON, EDWARD, grocer. Gateshead. Pet. Oct. 23. PARK, GEORGE, iron merchant, Swansea. Pet. Oct. 18. RICHARDS, HENRY, grocer, Castleford. Pet. Oct 23. Nov. ROBERTS, ROBERT, contractor, Burnley, Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 6, at three, at offices of Sols. Artindale and Artindale, Burnley ROBINSON, GEORGE POTTER ANTOINE, oil merchant, Penzance. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 13, at twelve. at the Grand hotel, Broad-st, Bristol. Sol. Cornish, Penzance SHEA, MICHAEL (under firm of the Oxford Carriage Co.). coach builder, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at three, at office of Sol. Lambert, Manchester SHELDRAKE, EDWARD, Straw hat manufacturer, St Albans. Pet. Oct. 15. Nov. 5, at three, at office of Sol. Well, St Albans SMITH, GEORGE, miller. Dawlish. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 6, at eleven, a. the Bude Haven hotel, Exeter. Sol. Whidborne SMITH, JOHN, horse dealer, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 12, at three, at office of Sol. Nadin, Salford. SPENCER, LUCY, milliner, Pendleton. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at three, at office of Sol. Evans, Manchester STATON, JESSE DAVID, Stonemason, Weston-super-Mare. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 18, at eleven, at office of Sol. Jones, Weston-super-Mare STEPHENS, JAMES WILLIAM. draper, St. Austell. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 5, at three, at offices of Sols. Coode, Shilson, and Co, St. Austell STEVENS, WILLIAM, ship broker (trading as Ogilby, Moore, and Co), 1, East India-avenue, Leadenhall-st. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 20, at two, at the Cannon-st hotel, Cannon-st, Sols. Lowless and Co, Martin's-la, Cannon-st STOBART, JOHN, grocer, Gateshead. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 5, at two, at office of Sol. Stanford, Newcastle STOCK, WILLIAM, jun, cab proprietor, Swansea. Pet. Oct. 19. Nov. 5, at eleven, at offices of Sols. Hartland, Davies, and Isaac, Swansea STOUT, WILLIAM EDWARDS, printer, Briggate. Pet. Oct. 16. Nov. 6, at three, at the Central chambers, Cocoa house, Boar-la. Leeds. Sol. Harle, Leeds TAPPIN, GEORGE, timber merchant, Old Castle-st, Bethnal Green. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at twelve, at the Guildhall tavern, Gresham-st. Sols. Roscoe, Hincks, and Sheppard, King-st, Finsbury-sq TAYLOR, WILLIAM BODELL, out of busine-s, Balsall Heath. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 6, at twelve, at office of Sol. Parry, Birmingham TEBBUTT, FRANK, chemist, Mortimer-st, Cavendish-sq. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at eleven, at offices of Sols. Deane, Chubb, and Co, Sonth-sq, Gray's-inn Pet. THORNTON, JOHN, and THORNTON, ALBERT, machine makers, WALMSLEY, SETH, slater, Southport. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. WESTGATE, WILLIAM HUMPHREY, painter, Great Yarmouth. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 14, at eleven, at offices of Sols. Clowes and Son, Great Yarmouth WHITE, BENJAMIN, draper, Saundersfoot. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 12, at half-past ten, at office of Sol. Thomas, Tenby WHITE, JOSEPH, victualler, High Holborn. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at three, at offices of Sols. Hicks and Arnold, Wel lingron-st, Strand WILKINSON, WILLIAM, engineer, Wigan. Pet. Oct. 21. WIMPENNY, ABRAHAM, beerhouse keeper, Widnes. Pet. ATTWOOD, THOMAS JAMES PARDEW, china dealer, St. BAILEY, JOHN BURN, bookseller, Holles-st, Cavendish-s7. Pet. Oct. 25, Nov. 12, at three, at offices of Sols. Lewis, Munns, and Longden, Old Jewry BANKS, CHARLES BDWIN, builder, Granville-rd, Lee. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 19, at three, as the Guildhall coffeehouse, Gresham-st. Sols. Bristow and Shepherd, London-st, Greenwich BANISTER, ALBERT, linendraper, Lee. Pet Oct. 25. Nov. 13, at two, at offices of Ladbury, Collison, and Viney, accountants, 99, Cheapside. Sol. Hagues, High st, Lewisham BAGSHAW, JOHN, farm labourer, Blacker Grange. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 18, at three, at office of Sol. Maddison, Barnsley BARKER, JOHN, tillage agent, York. Pet. Oct. 24, Nov. 12, at three, at office of Sol. Waddington, York BIGGINS, JOHN LOFLEY, grocer, Great Driffield. Pet. Oct. 18. Nov. 8, at two, at the Parazon hotel, Kingston-uponHull. Sol. White, Great Driffield BAILEY, JOSEPH, soda water manufacturer, Burslem. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 12, at eleven, at office of Sol. Bennett, Hanley BENTLEY, JAMES, grocer, Tunstall. Pet. Oct. 21, Nov. 11, at half-past two, at office of Sol. Hollinshead, Tunstall BERTRAM, WILLIAM, grocer, Chadsmoor. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 11, at half-past ten, at the George hotel, Walsall. Sol. Hollinshead, Tunstall Badger, Joseph, market gardener, Chapelry of Pinvin. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at eleven, at office of Sol. Martin, Pershore BOWHAY, WILLIAM HENRY, implement maker, Modbury. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 12, at eleven, at cffices of Sols. Elworthy, Curtis, and Dawe, Plymouth BEER, CHARLES FREDERICK, fruiterer, Swansea. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 12, at three, at office of Sol. Field. Swansea BROWN, JOHN, and CoоKE, WILLIAM, egg merchants, Stockport. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at three, at office of Scl. Newton, Stockport BRAY, WILLIAM, mason. Accrington. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. COLE, WILLIAM, tin plate worker, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 11, at three, at offices of Sols. Heath and Sons, Manchester COOPER, JOBX, and WOOD, GEORGE HENRY, provision dealers, Otley. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 11, at three, at Wharton's hotel, Park-la, Leeds COWARD, THOMAS BREARS, maltster, Knottingley. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 11, at three, at the Royal hotel, Wood-st, Wakefield. Sol. Lodge, Waxefield CATO, JOHN, the elder, painter, Byker. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 8, at twelve, at office of Sol. Stanford, Newcastle-uponTyne COYLE, PATRICK, innkeeper, Consett. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 13, at eleven, at the offices of Keenlyside and Foster, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Sol. Foster, Newcastle-upon-Tyne COCKING, THOMAS BONSOR, hotel keeper, Birmingham. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 4, at four, at the Great Western hotel, Birmingham. Sol. Simmons, Birmingham COULSON, WILLIAM, farmer, Heworth. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 12, at two, at offices of Sols. Joel and Joel, Newcastleupon-Tyne DEVIS, JAMES, licensed victualler, Leamington Priors. Pet Oct 17 Nov. 7, at two, at the Union hotel, Birmingham. Sol. Edge, Birmingham DALTON, SAMUEL, dairyman, Princes-rd, Notting-hill. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 14, at two, at office of Sol. Reynolds, Furnivals-inn, Holborn DEENING, SAMUEL, painter, Southport. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 13. at eleven, at offices of Sols. Buck and Dicksons, Southport DAVIES, GEORGE BAKER, tailor, Halifax. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 13, at three, at the White Swan hotel, Princess-st, Halifax. Sol. Longbottom, Halifax EADY, ARTHUR (and not CADY as previously advertised), grocer. Warwick. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 7, at three, at Berridge-chmbrs, Leicester. Sol. Stone, Billson, Willcox, and Dutton, Leicester EDGAR, THOMAS, innkeeper, Maryport. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 12, at three, at the Senhouse Arms hotel, Maryport. Sols. Tyson and Hobson, Maryport EDWARDS, DAVID, out of business, Pontypridd. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 9. at twelve, at office of EH. Howard, accountant, Pontypridd. Sol. Cooke, Pontypridd EDWARDS, WILLIAM, watchmaker, Llanidloes. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 7, at one, at the Stork hotel, Birmingham. Sol. Davies, Llanidloes ESDEN, JAMES HENRY, builder, Andover-rd. Hammersmith. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 18, at two, at office of Sol. Lowse, Newinn, Strand EATON, EDWARD, grocer, Wigan. Pet. Oct 24. Nov. 13, at three, at offices of Sols. Peace and Bell, Wigan ELLIS, WILLIAM, and ELLIS, THOMAS, cotton waste preparers, Nottingham. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 12, at twelve, at office of Press, accountant, Friar-la, Nottingham. Sol. Stevenson, Nottingham FISHER, WALTER, photographer. Filey. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 15, at twelve, at Challis's Royal hotel, Rupert-st, Coventryst, Haymarket. Sol. Watts, Scarborough GLASSBROOK, REBECCA, milliner, Westbourne grove trading as Majemoiselle Beatrice. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at twelve, at office of sol, Norman, Essex-st, Strand GRAPE, GEORGE, market gardener, Cheshunt. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 12, at two. at the Court house, Waltham Abbey. Sols. Duffield and Bruty, Tokenhouse-yard GODWIN, FREDERICK WILLIAM, coal merchant, Romsey. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 4, at two, at offices of Sol, Guy, Southampton GIBBINS, WILLIAM. elastic web factor, Leicester. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 8, at twelve, at 341, Belvoir-st, Leicester. Sol. Jeffery, Northampton HALE, JOHN, builder, Britton Ferry. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 12, at three, at offices of Sols. Tennant and Jones, Aber avon HALL, WILLIAM, farmer, Long Riston. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. HUSKISSON, ELIJAH, bricklayer. Jarrow-on-Tyne. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 6, at three, at office of Sol. Benning, Newcastle-upon-Tyne HOPPER, THOMAS HUTCHINSON, licensed victualler, Darling. ton. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 9, at ten, at office of Sol. Barron, Darlington HOWELLS, RICHARD, butcher, Neath. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 9, at eleven, at office of Sol. Davies, Neath JACOBS, SAMUEL, photographer, Dover. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 13, at one, at offices of Doyle and sons, 26, Carey-st, Lincoln's-inn. Sol. Fox, Dover JAMES, WILLIAM, grocer, Cleveland. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 8, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Jackson and Jackson, Middlesborough JOHNSON, WILLIAM, baker, Liverpool. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 18, at three, at offices of Sols. Yates, Son, and Stananought, Liverpool JONES, DAVID, draper, Llanddewibrefi. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 8, at two, at the County Court office, Lampeter. Sol. Lloyd, Lampeter JOLLY, WILLIAM, auctioneer, Bradford. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 8, at eleven, at office of Sol. Beverley, Bradford JONES, JOHN, collier, Aberavon. Pet Oct. 22. Nov. 16, at twelve. at offices of Sols. Tennant and Jones, Aberavon KNOX, WILLIAM, butcher. De Burgh-rd, New Wimbledon. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov 12, at ,at office of Sol. Waring, Borough High-st, Southwark LAWTON, FRANK, cotton waste dealer, Oldham. Pet. Oct. 24 LEWIS, JANE, and FITZGERALD, ELIZABETH, milliners, LOE, THOMAS, glass cutter, Clarence-pl, Deptford Broadway. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 19, at two, at offices of Sols. Pook and Son, Greenwich LOCKER, JOSEPH, out of business, Bridgewater. Pet. Oct. 2. Nov. 8, at eleven, at office of Sol. Chapman, Bridge water MARSH, GEORGE HAYWOOD, tea dealer, Burnley. Pet. Oct. MODLIN, HENRY JAMES, provision merchant, Newcastle. OAKLEY, WILLIAM, ironfounder, Bromley-by-Bow. Pet. Oct. Oct. 24. Nov. 8, at twelve, at the rooms of the Sheffield sea PARKER, JOHN, farmer, Leadgate. Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 6, at two, at office of Sol. Bush, Newcastle-upon-Tyne PIKE, JOSEPH, fishmonger, Swansea. Pet., Oct. 20. Nov. 5, at twelve, at the George hotel, Swansea. Sol. John, SwanREAD, FRANCIS, and READ, FREDERICK RICHARD, marble masons, Buckingham Palace-rd, Pimlico Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 13, at eleven, at office of Jarvis, accountant, Guildhall-climbs, Basing hall-st. Sol. Girling, Guildhall-chmbs ROBERTS, SAMUEL HACKETT, draper, Walworth-rd. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 18, at eleven, at office of Sol. Foster, Birchin-la REED, JOHN, boot manufacturer, Manchester. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 8, at three, at the Wellington hotel, Leicester. Sols. Edwards, Brazennose-st, Manchester ROBERTSHAW, Jous, and DENNIS, ABRAHAM, commission wool combers, Lee Bridge Mills. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 13, at eleven, at the White Swan hotel, Princess-st, Halifax. Sol. Longbottom, Halifax RAPPEL, CHARLES, builder, Newport. Pet, Oct. 2. Nov. 7. at twelve, at offices of Sols. Gibbs and Llewellyn, Newport SANDS, HENRY, furnishing ironmonger, Nottingham. Pet. SANGER, ELIZABETH BEEDELL, poulterer, Tiverton. ton SELLERS, WILLIAM HENRY, wholesale wire dealer, Crawshaw Booth. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 14, at three, at the Queen's hotel, Rawtenstall. Sols. Hargreaves and Knowles, Newchurch SPENCER, JOHN, farmer, Brailes. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 16, at two, at the George inn, Brailes. Sol. Stockton, Banbury SHAW, HERBERT, bootmaker, Cradley Heath. Pet. Oct. 2. Nov. 7, at ten, at office of Sol. Addison, Brierley Hill SHARP, JOHN, builder, Derby. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 18, at three, at the Bell hotel, Sadlergate, Derby. Sol. Hextall, Derby SHEPPHERD, CHARLES HENRY, cab proprietor, Bristol, Pet. Oct. 26. Nov. 6, at eleven, at office of So.. Meeres, Bristol SOWERBY, ISAAC, husbandman, Mount Pleasant. Pet. Ort. 26. Nov. 15, at eleven, at offices of Sols. Ramshay and Mole, Brampton SWINDELLS, JOHN, out of business, Bradford. Pet Oct. 24. Nov. 12, at half-past three, at office of Sol. Neill, Bradford STOREY, RALPH, farmer, Low Butcher Race. Pet. Oct. A. Nov. 11, at eleven, at the Rose and Crown hotel, Marketpl, Durham. Sol. Chapman, Durham TAYLOR, HOLLAND, machinist, Oldham, Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 11, at three, at offices of Sols, Ascroft and Sons, Oldham TINCKHAM, ROBERT, and TINCKHAM, PETER, builders, Blechynden-st, Notting-hill. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 11, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Woodfin and Wray, Finsburycircus TWIBILL. JOSEPH, engineer, Broadheath. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 14, at three, at offices of Hinde, Milne. and Sudlow, 7, Mount-st, Manchester. Sols. Nicholls, Hinde, and Co., Altrincham TOMLINSON, MATTHEW, Confectioner, Salford. Pet. Oct. 2. Nov. 11, at three, at offices of Sols. Makinson and Sons, Manchester TIMEWELL, ARTHUR THOMAS, surveyor, Clapham-r. Pet Oct. 25. Nov. 11, at two, at offices of Sols. Duignan and Smiles, Bedford-row, Holborn Pet. Pet. Oct. 2. THOMPSON, WILLIAM HENRY, saddler, Waterfoot. ARTHUR DRAKEFORD, umbrella furniture manufacturer, Birmingham. Pet. Oct. 25. Nov. 11, at three, at offices of Sols. Wright and Marshall, Birmingham TREMBATH, RICHARD, ironmonger. Penzance. Pet. Oct. 22. Nov. 12, at eleven, at office of Sols. Roscorla, Penzance THOMPSON, CHARLES, clerk, Birkenhead. Pet. Oct. 21. Nov. 12, at three, at office of Mawson, public accountant, Duncan-st. Birkenhead. Sols. Hannan and Pagh, Birkenhead TILLEY, ROBERT HAYWARD, out of business, Frome. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 15, at half-past eleven, at the Great Wester hotel, Dorchester-st, Bath. Sol. Grey, Bradford-on-Avo. URRY, ALFRED, shoemaker, Newport. Isle of Wight. Pet. Oct. 24. Nov. 16, at eleven, at office of Sol. Lamport, Newport, Isle of Wight WADE, GEORGE, draper, Crewe. Pet. Oct. 23. Nov. 14, as eleven, at office of Sol. Pointon, Crewe WATSON, BENJAMIN, commercial traveller, Wimborne Minster. Pet. Oct. 17. Nov. 4, at three, at cffices of Sols. Shutte and Nockolds, Southampton WALKER, ROGER, rope maker, Sharples. Pet. Oct. 25. Nor 11. at eleven, at the Victoria hotel, Bolton. Sol, Whitfield. Chorley Limitation of l'ability-LaunchShip-Recognised British ship Registration-Shipbuilder 204 BANKRUPTCY LAW Digest of Bankruptcy Decisions in the year 1877.... Ipswich County Court Southwark County Court COUNTY COURTS LAW SOCIETIES Law Association Bolton Law Society ECCLESIASTICAL LAW Notes of New Decisions........... COMPANY LAW Notes of New Decisions.... CORRESPONDENCE OF THE PROFESSION... 31 Promotions and Appointments List of Business for the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 33 Rota of Registrars in attendance 33 LEGAL OBITUARY J. Ivimey, Esq. J. Gwillim, Esq C. J. Sidebottom, Esq. THE GAZETTES...... 33 34 34 34 BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS...... 36 The Law and the Lawyers. THE inconvenience occasioned by the holding of assizes in November is made glaringly apparent by the condition of the several courts. At the commencement of the sittings, and for some time after, two Lords Justices, a Chancery judge, and several of the common law judges were engaged on the circuits. Counsel on the Northern and North-Eastern Circuits were also away, and could not move their new trials. New trial papers being called on could not be proceeded with owing to the absence on circuit of judges who had tried the cases. Worst of all, the Court of Appeal can only work at half pressure. Luckily for the judicature, new business is almost unknown, and the consequences of the condition of things to which we refer may not be very serious. But this is not to be anticipated in future years, and attention will have to be directed to the question how the Winter Assizes Act can be worked without disorganising our metropolitan courts. IT is interesting to examine the County Court statistics as to remitted causes. In 1876, 483 were remitted from the High Court; and in 1877, 770. Those under sect. 26 of the Act of 1856 were in the main actions for small amounts for goods sold VOL LXVI.-No 1858. and delivered, which ought not to have been commenced in the superior court. Some apparently serious actions of tort were remitted, but the majority seem to have been vexatious, or the amounts claimed absurdly inflated. The following is a fair specimen Damages to goods and conversion, £200 claimedsettled; detinue, claim £50, recovered, £37; damage, personal injury, £200, recovered, £42; assault and false imprisonment, £200, judgment for defendant; negligent driving, £250, recovered £100; malicious prosecution, £500-withdrawn; wages and slander, £500, verdict for defendant; wrongful arrest and imprisonment, £500, recovered £25; personal injuries, £500, apparently settled; slander £300-nonsuit; trespass, £50, recovered £2; false imprisonment, £100, struck out; malicious prosecution, £50, ditto, no plaintiff; negligence, £110, verdict for defendant; false imprisonment, £100, recovered £10; detinue, £50, not heard. Then follow fifteen causes, of which seven were struck out, or there was a nonsuit, or they were withdrawn. This proves that legitimate business is taken away from the High Court to a very small extent, and that what are got rid of are causes, generally speaking, that either ought not to have been brought, or were of a character fit only for an inferior tribunal. MUCH controversy has been lately called forth by the refusal of the English Government to allow the acceptance by British competitors at the French International Exhibition of the decoration of the Legion of Honour. It does not seem to be generally known that the rules of law, using the term law in a broad sense, upon which that refusal was based, were published in the London Gazette, so long ago as the 6th Dec. 1823. Those rules are contained in six sections. The first provides that no British subject shall accept a foreign order, or wear its insignia, without having previously obtained a warrant under the royal sign manual, directed to the Earl Marshal of England, granting His Majesty's permission to accept and wear the same; the second, that the intention of a foreign sovereign to decorate a British subject with the insignia of such order shall be notified to His Majesty's principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; the third, that when such foreign secretary shall have taken His Majesty's pleasure, and obtained his consent on the occasion, he shall then signify the same to the Home Secretary, in order that he may cause the usual warrant to be prepared for the royal sign manual, and take such other steps as may be necessary; the fourth, that when the warrant is duly signed it shall be announced in the Gazette, and registered in the College of Arms; the fifth, that no British subject can be allowed to accept the insignia of a foreign order from any govereign of a foreign state, unless such insignia are conferred in consequence of active and distinguished services before the enemy, either at sea or in the field, or unless he shall have been employed in the service of such foreign sovereign; the sixth and last, that such licence and permission does not authorise, and shall not be deemed or construed to authorise the assumption of any style, appellation, rank, precedence, or privilege appertaining to a knight bachelor of these realms. These rules are still in force. They are so clear in their terms that it is hard to discover on what grounds any fault has been found with the Government for the refusal to which we have alluded. A CASE has come recently before the Circuit Court of Cook County (U. S.) disclosing a system which might be very well introduced into Great Britain. A regularly educated graduate, licensed to practise as a physician and enjoying a large practice in Chicago, was threatened by the State Board of Health with the revocation of his licence. He thereupon applied to the circuit court for an injunction to restrain the board from so doing. The ground upon which the board issued its threat was that the physician had advertised in a manner which the board considered unprofessional and dishonourable. The State Board, it appears, is a corporation composed of seven persons appointed by the Governor of the State by and with the advice of the Senate. It is entrusted with the charge of medical practice and medical practitioners, and by the language of the Act of incorporation has surveillance of the professional conduct of physicians. It may refuse certificates to practise, and revoke those already granted. Several physicians made affidavits that the applicant's advertisements were unprofessional, and then the question arose whether the power vested in the board was unconstitutional. The Court held that the right to practise medicine was not a contract, nor property, but a mere naked grant of a privilege upon terms imposed by statute. Consequently it was determined that the board had full discretion, and might revoke a practitioner's licence for unprofessional conduct, of which they must be the judges. It would be a good thing if the Incorporated Law Society were invested with similar powers, in order that an end might be put to the careers of solicitors who advertise and tout, and do other acts of an unprofessional character. Ir is remarkable how frequently questions arise upon sect. 11 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854. We have lately reported another-namely, the case of Moffatt v. Cornelius (39 L. T. Rep. N. S. 102). In that case the plaintiff had bought a cargo of maize from the defendant. One of the clauses contained in the contract was to the effect that if any dispute should arise "the contract not to be void, it being agreed to leave the same to be settled by two London cornfactors, whose decision should be final." The plaintiff having paid £650 on account, rejected the maize on the ground that it was not of the crop and quality contracted for, and sued the defendant to recover the amount paid on account. The defendant refused to return the money, for the reason that the dispute was one which ought to be referred to arbitration under the agreement to refer in the contract, and applied for and obtained a stay of proceedings under sect. 11 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854. The section in question provides that whenever the parties to any deed or instrument in writing agree that any then existing or future differences between them shall be referred to arbitration, and any of the parties so agreeing nevertheless commences an action against the other party in respect of the matters so agreed to be referred, it shall be lawful for a judge of the court in which the action is brought, on application by the defendant after appearance and before plea, upon being satisfied that no sufficient reason exists why such matters cannot be or ought not to be referred to arbitration according to the agreement and that the defendant was and is willing to do everything necessary and proper for causing the matters in dispute to be decided by arbitration, to make an order staying all proceedings. The order obtained by the defendant was reversed by Mr Justice LOPES. The defendant appealed to the Queen's Bench Division, where Mr. Justice LOPES's order was itself reversed. The plaintiff then appealed. Wickham v. Harding (28 L. J. 215 Ex.) is an authority for the proposition that the exercise of jurisdiction is a matter of discretion with the court. But to entitle defendant to a stay of proceedings he must make out, in the first place, that there is an agreement to refer, and in the second, he must satisfy the court that no sufficient reason exists why such matter cannot or ought not to be referred. For the appellant, in the present case, it was argued that the section did not apply unless there was an existing reference to arbitration capable of being carried into effect. In Moffatt v. Cornelius there was no such existing reference, for there had been a revocation. Bright v. Burnell (4 Dowl. 756) was quoted in support of the contention. That case is an authority for the proposition that the Act does not apply when the submission is incomplete. Hence, where arbitrators were appointed in pursuance of a clause in a deed that all disputes should be referred to the arbitration of two persons named, who are directed to choose an umpire before they proceed, but the umpire has not been appointed, it is not within the statute: (Ib.) The subsequent case of Randall v. Thompson (35 L. T. Rep. N. S. 193) was also cited on behalf of the appellant. There the parties had submitted their differences to a named arbitrator. He undertook the arbitration, and proceeded in it for three months. Before he made his award one of the parties revoked his submission. Hence, inasmuch as the arbitrator was named in the reference, the court had no power to appoint another. The judgment of the Queen's Bench Division was affirmed. "The substantial point made by the defendant," said Lord Justice COTTON, "is that there was no agreement to refer within the meaning of the Common Law Procedure Act, at the time of action brought. It is not disputed that, if the case is within the section, there was a matter of difference. The question is, was there such an agreement? The case relied on (Randall v. Thompson) by the defendant is distinguishable. There is a great difference between the revocation of an agreement to refer and of a submission to arbitration. In that case all matters in difference were submitted to a particular individual. That submission was revoked, and there was no power to appoint another arbitrator. Here there is a general agreement to refer; and though one party refuses to nominate an arbitrator, the Common Law Procedure Act enables the other party to get over the difficulty. There was therefore a subsisting agreement, at the time of action brought, to refer the question to arbitration, and the court below were right in staying proceedings." This distinction between a general agreement to refer and an agreement to refer to a particular arbitrator is not difficult of comprehension; yet, as pointed out by Lord Justice THESIGER, it was quite competent to the appellant to revoke a particular submission. THE inconvenience of the rule established now nearly two years ago by the case of Warner v. Murdoch (35 L. T. Rep. N. S. 748), that a trial by jury cannot be heard before a judge of the Chancery Division, was well exemplified in the case of McDougall v. Copestake, which occupied the Queen's Bench Division the greater part of Wednesday morning. This case came before the court in the form of an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice FIELD at Chambers, refusing to make an order upon a summons of_the defendant. The plaintiff, who was the proprietor of the Hour newspaper, was desirous of discontinuing and selling his business, and for that purpose put himself into communication with a Mr. BEDALL, who in his turn mentioned the matter to the defendant. The defendant was anxious that the business should be continued in the plaintiff's name, and eventually terms were arranged by which it was agreed that the defendant should lay down £10,000 to be expended upon the business, which was to be continued upcr certain conditions. These terms were reduced to the form of a written agreement intended for the signature of the defendant. Before his signature had been obtained, however, the other partners, in the firm of which he was a member, objected to his being directly concerned in the matter, and in consequence of their objections it was arranged that BEDALL'S name should be substituted for that of the defendant in the agreement, and that the defendant should pay the £10,000 to BEDALL. The defendant, moreover, according to the plaintiff, made various parol promises to indemnify the plaintiff for any loss resulting to him from the change of names, but such indemnity did not appear upon the face of the agreement. The plaintiff commenced an action against BEDALL and the defendant in the Chancery Division, claiming specific performance of the agreement, and also that the deferdant might be decreed to sign a proper indemnity in accordance with the intention of the parties. The case was tried before ViceChancellor HALL in May 1877, who nonsuited the plaintiff as far as his action against the present defendant was concerned, and directed certain accounts as between the plaintiff and BEDALL The Court of Appeal subsequently affirmed this decision. The plaintiff then commenced the present action against the defendant in the Queen's Bench Division, founding his cause of action not upon the agreement itself, but upon the collateral promises and representations of the defendant. The pleadings were completed. and notice of trial given for Middlesex, and the defendant then took out the summons above mentioned in which he applied under Order LI., r. 2, for a transfer of the action to Vice-Chancellor HALL'S Court, or in the alternative, that the trial should be delayed until after the accounts between BEDALL and the plaintiff, then being taken in the Chancery Division, should be completed. At chambers the plaintiff offered to allow the defendant to claim any advantage from the statement of accounts when completed, and was willing to run the risk of its being against him so only that the action were allowed to come on in its proper course. On the defendant being dissatisfied with this, the learned judge declined to make any order, and the defendant accordingly moved the court by way of appeal. In support of the appeal it was contended that the action pending, though different in_form from that already decided, was the same in substance, and that the Vice-Chancellor having heard all the facts would be able immediately to say whether all, and if not how much, of the new action was res judicata, and that any issues of fact that it might be necessary to try could be sent down for trial by a jury. It was further contended that the accounts taken in the Chancery Division could then be utilised, and in all probability an expensive inquiry averted. To this it was answered that the causes of action were totally distinct, and that the question in the second action was entirely one for a jury; that a pure question of law had been raised in the Chancery Division, and that it was now desired to try a pure question of fact; that if issues were directed by the Chancery judge the inquiry would probably be carried to a greater length than it would be by retaining the case in the Queen's Bench Division; and that the plaintiff's offer at chambers, and which he repeated in court, was sufficient to obviate the defendant's objections on the score of the accounts not yet completed. Obviously the most convenient mode of trial would have been before the Vice-Chancellor with a jury. Even though the cause of action be different, there can be no doubt that the two inquiries would cover a great deal of the same ground, and that the Vice-Chancellor would be able at any rate considerably to shorten the trial were it held before him. Inasmuch, however, as the plaintiff demanded a jury, and was entitled to have one, this was impossible, and the Court did the best it could under the circumstances by granting the second part of the defendant's application and refusing the first, counsel on both sides engaging to be bound by the statement of account between the plaintiff and BEDALL. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE stated that he arrived at this decision in consequence of the conclusion arrived at by the judges of the Chancery Division with respect to trial by jury-a conclusion, however, in which he said he by no means shared; on the contrary he thought that under the Judicature Acts they had the same power to try causes with a jury as previously they had under Lord CAIRNS' Act. He further said that, in his opinion, a rule of court ought to be made to reverse those decisions, and that he intended to bring the matter forward at the next meeting of the judges with that object. We heartily wish his Lordship every success. THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION AND THE ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS. We do not wish to underrate the importance of the controversy as to the respective jurisdictions of the Queen's Bench and the Court of Arches, which has been elaborated in the judgments delivered by the Lord Chief Justice and Lord Penzance; but it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that neither law nor public policy would have sustained any shock at all had the judgment of Mr. Justice Lush, in Martin v. Mackonochie, been adopted as the judgment of the Queen's Bench Division. The public certainly had been taught to recognise in Lord Penzance, con |