« 上一頁繼續 »
unrivalled popularity and classic fame, while hundreds, their contemporaries, successors, and imitators, have perished, with the accidents, or caprice, or fashion, which procured them any share of public attention.
To this pre-eminence the writers whose works are now before us, seem justly entitled from the importance of the task they under. took, and the manner in which they executed what has seldom been attempted but with a repulsive and unaccommodating sternness. The more serious duties of religion had not becn neglected by those who wrote to reform the age; but for common life and manners, no precepts were laid down, except what were too general or too precise. The instructions contained in the systematic writers on morality, were not devoid of force, or argunent; but their style was unpolished, and with the gay and idle their tediousness was ill-calculated to agree. Abuses crept in, which were beneath the attention of the pulpit, or the bar. Public amusements, which are not indifferent to the manners of a nation, were encumbered with absurdities, which impeded their usefulness even as vehicles of mere entertainment. Though purified from much of their licentiousness by the indefatigable zeal of Collier, they were not yet rational; and beyond the waste of an hour, which to the idle is certainly of great importance, their influence was unperceived. Foreign fopperies, ignorance, and indecorous affectations had introduced many improprieties into public and private life, for which no remedy was provided in the funds of general instruction, and which consequently prevailed“ with impunity until the appearance of the EsSAYISTS, who, struck with the necessity of supplying the lesser wants of society, determined to subdivide instruction into such portions as might suit those temporary demands, and casual exigencies, which were overlooked by graver writers, and more bulky theorists : or, in the language of Addison, “ to bring philosophy out of closets and libraries, schools and colleges, to dwell in clubs and assemblies, at tea-tables, and in coffee-houses.”
Of the origin of this species of writing Dr. Johnson has given a sketch which it were to be wished he had illustrated by research. Yet though written in advanced life, when inquiry became irksome, it is too highly valuable for elegance of diction, and justice of criticism, to be omitted in this place.
" To teach the minuter decencies and inferior duties, to regulate the practice of daily conversation, to correct those depravities which are rather ridiculous than criminal, and remore those grievances, which, if they produce no lasting calamitics, impress hourly vexation, was first attempted by Casa, in his book of Manners, and Castiglione in his Courtier ; two books yet celebrated in Italy for půrity and elegance, and which, if they are now less read, are neglected only because they have effected that reformation which their authors
intended, and their precepts now are no longer wanted. Their usefulness to the age in which they were written is sufficiently attested by the translations which almost all the nations of Europe were in haste to obtain.
** This species of instruction was continued, and, perhaps, advanced by the French : among whom LA BRUYERE's Manners of the Age, though, as Boileau remarked, it is written without connection, certainly deserves great praise, for liveliness of description, and justness of observation.
“ Before the Tatler and SPECTATOR, if the writers for the theatre are excepted, England had no masters of common life. No writers had yet undertaken to reform either the savageness of neglect, or the impertinence of çivility ; to show when to speak, or to be si. lent; how to refuse, or how to comply. We had many books to teach us our more important duties, and to settle opinions in philosophy or politics : but an Arbiter elegantiarum, a judge of propriety, was yet wanting, who should survey the track of daily conversation, and free it from thorns and prickles, which teaze the passer, though they do not wound him.
“ For this purpose nothing is so proper as the frequent publication of short papers, which we read not as study, but amusement. If the subject be slight, the treatise likewise is short. The busy may find time, and the idle may find patience.
" This mode of conveying cheap and easy knowledge began among us in the civil war, when it was much the interest of either party to raise and fix the prejudices of the people. At that time appeared Mercurius Aulicus, Mercurius Rusticus, and Mercurius Civicus. It is said, that when any title grew popular, it was stolen by the antagonist, who by this stratagem conveyed his notions to those who would. not have received him, had he not worn the appearance of a friend. The tumult of those unhappy days left scarcely any man leisure to treasure up occasional compositions; and so much were they neglected, that a complete collection is no where to be found.
“ These Mercuries were succeeded by L' ESTRANGE's OBSERVATOR, and that by LESLEY's REHEARSAL, and perhaps by others : but hitherto nothing had been conveyed to the people, in this commodious manner, but controversy relating to the church or state : of which they taught many to talk, whom they could not teach to judge.
“ It has been suggested that the Royal Society was instituted soon after the Restoration, to divert the attention of the people from public discontent. The TATLER and SPECTATOR had the same tendency: they were published at a time when two parties, loud, restless, and violent, each with plausible declarations, and each perhaps without any distinct termination of its views, were agitating the nation ; to minds heated with political contest, they supplicd cooler and more inoffensive reflections ; and it is said by Addison, in a subsequent work, that they had a perceptible influence upon the conversation of that time, and taught the frolic and the gay to unite merriment with decency; an effect which they can never wholly lose, while they continue to be among the first books by which both sexes are initiated in the elegances of knowledge *.”
In this sketch, we may observe, that the praise of original design is still reserved for the author of the TATLER. If Casa and Castiglione were allowed to be exceptions, we might add to the number by reciting the titles of many works published in England, for the regulation of manners : among these PEACHAM, BRAITHWAITE, and Sir FRANCIS VERE, were writers of no inconsiderable fame. Essayists on general subjects were more numerous : FELTHAM's Resolves was a very popular book, and has more merit than will be allowed by those who are anxious rather to be pleased, than to be instructed ; and it would be unpardonable to omit the Essays of Lord Bacon, “ which for sound philosophy and accurate observation, have not been exceeded, nor perhaps equalled +." Translations were also published from Montaigne, and other foreign au.. thors; but still no attempt had been made on the plan of the PERIODICAL Essay.
* Johnson's Life of ADDISON. if BEATTIE: