poet, which could accompany the drowned body of his friend beneath the ocean, through a variety of fuppofed fituations, in which he imagines it attended by the newly separated fpirit. His apoftrophe to the dolphins must however relate to the inanimate form; for the affistance of dolphins to convey an incorporeal fubject, would certainly be unneceffary: V. 154. Ay me! whilft thee the shores and founding feas The common conclufion of a funeral elegy, is the beatification of the deceafed. Milton has not deviated from this plan, but he has executed it with unufual ufual grandeur, both of thought and expreffion. But the paffage, however sublime, is not wholly free from faults. The day-star is very poetically, but not correctly introduced, both as a perfon, repairing his drooping head, &c. and as an orb of radiance, flaming in the forehead of the morning fky. There seems alfo fome incongruity in the fcriptural idea of Lycidas having the tears wiped from his eyes, and the claffical one of his becoming the genius of the shore: V.165. Weep no more, woful fhepherds, weep no more, For Lycidas your forrow is not dead, Sunk though he be beneath the watry floor; waves, Where other groves and other ftreams along With With nectar pure his oozy locks he leaves, The termination of the Piece has great merit. The Shepherd elegiaft, who, contrary to the general practice, has not been yet formally introduced, but only fuppofed prefent; is now fet before us among his oaks and rills, warbling his Dorick lay from morning to evening. Milton, always peculiarly happy in the measurement of time, has marked the above-mentioned periods, the one by a fine profopopoeia, the other by a pictu Shakespeare and Milton are high authorities, but they cannot authorize such a violent fubftitution of one word for another, as unexpreffive; the negative of expreffive, for inexpreffible. refque refque natural circumftance; the Morn goes forth in her grey fandals, and the fun, after stretching out all the hills, finks into the ocean : Thus fang the uncouth fwain to the oaks and rills, Milton has been generally fuppofed to have introduced in this poem, a great number of antiquated phrases. This opinion, however it came to obtain, is erroneous. On a close examination, there will not be found, in near two hundred lines, a dozen words of obfolete character.* Whether Lycidas fhould be confidered as a model of compofition, has Viz. Rathe, ferannel, felf-fame, fwart, ruth, freakt, trick, as a substitute for adorn, and perhaps two or three more. been been doubted. Some have fuppofed that the arbitrary difpofition of the rhymes produces a wild melody, adapted to the expreffion of forrow. Some have thought the couplet and tetraftick with their stated returns of chime, preferable. To decide the point by argument, might be difficult; but fuppofing two elegies, one of each structure, to be equally well written in other respects, probably most readers would incline to favour the regular form.|| Lycidas is a noble poem: the author's name is not wanted to recommend it: its own enthusiasm and beauty will always make it please, and abundantly atone for its incorrectness. There is a Paftoral on the death of Sir PHILIP SIDNEY, printed with SPENSER's works, a poem of fome merit, nearly of the fame conftruction as LYCIDAS. ESSAY |