 The sovereignty of a state extends to everything which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission; but does it extend to those means which are employed by congress to carry into execution powers conferred on that body by the people...  Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York - 第 207 頁New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero 著 - 1866完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | 1819 - 660 頁
...by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission, but does not extend to those means which are employed by congress to carry into execution powers...conferred on that body by the people of the United States? We think it demonstrable that it does not. These powers are not given by the people of a single state.... | |
 | John Taylor - 1820 - 378 頁
...authority, or is introduced by its per" mission, but does not extend to the means employed by con" gress to carry into execution, powers conferred on that body " by the people of the United States." " Such is the character of human language, that no word " conveys to the mind, in all situations, one... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1830 - 646 頁
...which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission ;" but not " to those means which are employed by congress to carry into execution powers...use" the power of taxation "on the means employed by i lie government of the Union, in pursuance of the constitution, is itself an abuse, because it is... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1835 - 624 頁
...which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission ;" but not " to those means which are employed by congress to carry into execution powers...States." "The attempt to use" the power of taxation " on tlie means employed by the government of the Union, in pursuance of the constitution, is itself an... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 頁
...introduced by its permission ; but 4 Wh. «S8. tJAltJll L" the e does it extend to those means which are employed by congress to carry into execution powers...conferred on that body by the people of the United States ? We think it demonstrable that it does not. Those powers are not given by the people of a single state.... | |
 | George Washington Frost Mellen - 1841 - 452 頁
...exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission; but does it extend to those means employed by congress to carry into execution powers...conferred on that body by the people of the United States? We think it demonstrable it does not. These powers are not given by the people of a single State; they... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 554 頁
...own anthority, or is introduced by its own permission ; but it does not extend to those means which are employed by Congress to carry into execution powers...that body by the people of the United States. The law of Rhode Island taxing the Bank, was therefore held to be constitutional and valid. arose, Craig... | |
 | Andrew White Young - 1855 - 1032 頁
...But the sovereignty of a state extends only to what exists by its own authority, but not to the means employed by congress to carry into execution powers...conferred on that body by the people of the United States. These powers are not given by the people of a single state, but by the people of all the states, to... | |
 | Daniel Gardner - 1860 - 740 頁
...which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission ; but not to those means which are employed by Congress to carry into execution powers...conferred on that body by the people of the United States. That the attempt to use the power of taxation on the means employed by the government of the Union,... | |
 | 1862 - 802 頁
...authority, or which was introduced by its permission, was held not to " extend to those means which are employed by Congress to carry into execution powers...on that body by the people of the United States." (See opinion of Chief Justice Marshall, p. 429.) The same question again arose in Osborn vs. The United... | |
| |
