Those, then, who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only the law. American Quarterly Review - 第184页编者: - 1827全本阅读 - 图书信息
| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1804 - 514 页
...doftrine would fubvert the very foundation of all written conftitutions. It would declare that an aft, which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void; is yet, in praftice, completely obligatory. It would declare, that if the legiflature fhall do what is exprefsly... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 486 页
...legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the...courts must close their eyes on the constitution, and sec only the law. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions. It... | |
| James Kent - 1832 - 590 页
...an act of the legislature, the courts must decide between these conflicting rules, and how can they close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law ? This great question may be regarded as now finally settled, and I consider it to be one of the most interesting... | |
| Joseph Story - 1833 - 800 页
...that the constitution is to be considered, in courts, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necesBity of maintaining, that courts must close their eyes on the constitution and see ouly the law. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation pendent structure they may repose with... | |
| Joseph Story - 1851 - 642 页
...and executive enjoy a secure and irresistible triumph. 1 To the people at large, therefore, such an must close their eyes on the constitution and see...constitutions. It would declare that an act, which, aecording to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet in practice completely... | |
| James Kent - 1851 - 706 页
...an act of the legislature, the courts must decide between these conflicting rules, and how can they close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law ? This great question may be regarded as now finally settled, and I consider it to be one of the most interesting... | |
| William Blackstone, George Sharswood - 1860 - 874 页
...legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the...necessity of maintaining that courts must close their oyes on the constitution and see only the law. This doctrine must subvert the very foundation of all... | |
| Andrew Johnson - 1868 - 532 页
...legislature — the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the...act which, according to the principles and theory of oar government, U entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that... | |
| 1868 - 542 页
...legislature — the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the...law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courte must close their eyes on the Constitution and see only the law. This doctrine would subvert... | |
| Benjamin Robbins Curtis, Alexander James Dallas, William Cranch, United States. Supreme Court, Henry Wheaton, Richard Peters, Benjamin Chew Howard - 1870 - 708 页
...legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the...their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law. Mnrbury v. Madison. 1 C. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions.... | |
| |