網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small]

ters of faith, they are as fallible in other parts of know-
ledge as other men

[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

The difficulty of the falvation of friers, by reafon of the
numberless duties of a monaftery
Page 237
An excellent remark of St. Ambrofe on the mischievous
confequences of too many ecclefiaftical precepts

238

Simony practifed at the court of Rome, notwithstanding
the decrees and canons of many Councils point-blank
against it.

239

Why the fecular powers do at any time approve of the
decrees of Councils

T

ibid.

Why more indulto's and privileges are granted to fome
princes than to others
ibid.

The Greek Church winks at the non-obfervance of eccle-

fiaftical ftatutes in certain cafes, but never grants dif-

penfations

The rife and progrefs of the Pope's fovereign power

[ocr errors]

The conduct of Pope Sixtus IV towards the Venetians, after they had taken Ferrara, whofe duke had attacked them. Page 246 The ufe which the Pope makes of canons, and pofitive

laws

247

An account of the major excommunication of the bull in Cana Domini, with refpect to herefies; and of that decree called Extravagante

ibid.

By what means Æneas Sylvius, an heretic, got to be Pope; and how he afterwards recanted his former propofitions 248 Excommunications proved from that election to be meer Brutum fulmen

ibid.

The fum and fubftance of the Pope's complaints against

the Venetians

ibid

ibid.

The only fuperiority the Pope can challenge in foreign domains An anfwer to the Pope's charge against the Venetians of keeping the ecclefiaftical power in bondage

248 to 253 The reafon which every free prince has to hinder his fubjects from being cited to a foreign tribunal 249 The ridiculous and fatal confequences of the Pope's pretenfions on this head

250

An inquiry into the Pope's eftablishment and authority ว ibid.

4

That a lay prince derives his authority from God

251, &

ibid.

The obedience which St. Peter and St. Paul prefcribe as due to fuch princes The impoffibility of reconciling their injunctions with the conduct of the court of Rome in that point 25% The proof which is expected from a Pope who pretends to exercife his authority in another's country 253 An answer to the charge against the Venetians, that they debar the acquifition of lands from regular monks and places of piety That the Venetians lay both the monks and the Jews under this incapacity for different reasons The two fundamental parts of fovereignty

[ocr errors]

254

ibid.

ibid.

The

The mifery of princes who are only titular, and of those who have fubjects, but no revenue Page 255 The wife precaution of the Venetians in putting a ftop to the monks acquifition of lands, and their decree thereupon 256,257,258 The good difpofition of the Venetians to repeal that law, if the Pope would but acknowledge the Rights of Sovereigns to tax the clergy as well as the laity ibid.&c. The privilege of the friers in Venice; 258, &c. An answer to the fecond charge against the Venetians, that they permis thofe who only rented the clergy's eftates to keep them by prefcription, as much as if they were their oun lawful property

259

ibid.

The term of time which prescribes every action in the fecular courts at Venice The reasonableness and equity of the faid prefcription, and a prolongation of the term in favour of the clergy The advantages which the clergy reap from it to the prejudice of the laity

260

261

Answer to the third charge, that the lay tribunal pretends to judge ecclefiaftics in affairs civil and criminal 262, &c. That the perfons of ecclefiaftics are no longer facred than their actions

263 That citing the laity to the fpiritual courts is unreafonable, and contrary to the rights of fovereigns ibid. The only caufe brought before the nuncio's tribunal at

crimes

7

264

Venice Answer to the fourth charge, that the Venetians binder bishops not only from trying malefactors for their lives, in cafes depending on the mixed courts, but also from punifbing the clergy themselves, though convicted of fcandalous 264, &c. The Right of Sovereigns to judge his ecclefiaftic as well as lay fubjects The confequence of a prince's giving up the power of rewarding and punishing to another. The crimes which are cognizable by the lay tribunal

[ocr errors]

ibid.

265, 268

ibid.

What would be the confequence of trying the fame in the fpiritual courts

266 Who

« 上一頁繼續 »