nance of the Corporation of the
city of Washington, gave a bond
to the corporation, conditioned
"truly and impartially to execute
the duty and authority vested in
him by the ordinance;" held,
that the person entitled to a prize
ticket had no right to bring a suit
for the prize against the manager,
upon his bond, in the name of the
corporation, without their con-
sent. Corporation of Washing-
ton v. Young,
406
9. An appeal under the Judiciary
Acts of 1789, c. 20. s. 22. and of
1803, c 353. [xciii.] prayed for,
and allowed within five years, is
valid, although the security was
not given until after the lapse of
five years.
The Dos Hermanos,
306. 311
6. The act of assembly of Kentucky
of the 21st of December, 1821,
which prohibits the sale of pro-
perty taken under execution, for
less than three fourths of its ap-
praised value, without the consent
of the owner, does not apply to
a venditioni exponas issued out of
the Circuit Court for the District See
of Kentucky. Bank of United
States v. Halstead,
as to subject to execution, issuing See ADMIRALTY, 42.
out of the Federal Courts, lands
and other property not thus sub-
ject by the State laws in force at
that time.
1. Seizures made, jure belli, by non-
commissioned captors, are made
for the government, and no title