網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

celled, if he had not divided his powers to different pursuits.

As a poet, had he been only a poet, he would probably have ftood high among the authors with whom he is now affociated. For his judgement was exact, and he noted beauties and faults with very nice difcernment; his imagination, as the Dacian Battle proves, was vigorous and active, and the ftores of knowledge were large by which his imagination was to be fupplied. His ear was well-tuned, and his diction was elegant and copious. But his devotional poetry is, like that of others, unfatisfactory. The paucity of its topicks enforces perpetual repetition, and the fanctity of the matter rejects the orna

ments

ments of figurative diction. It is fuffi

cient for Watts to have done better than others what no man has done well.

His poems on other fubjects feldom rife higher than might be expected from the amusements of a Man of Letters, and have different degrees of value as they are more or lefs laboured, or as the occafion was more or lefs favourable to invention.

His writes too often without regular measures, and too often in blank verse; the rhymes are not always fufficiently correfpondent. He is particularly unhappy in coining names expreffive of characters. His lines are commonly smooth and easy, and his thoughts always religiously pure; but who is there that, to fo much piety

and

and innocence, does not wifh for a greater measure of fpriteliness and vigour? But he is at least one of the few poets with whom youth and ignorance may be fafely pleased; and happy will be that reader whofe mind is difpofed by his verses, or his profe, to imitate him in all but his non-conformity, to copy his benevolence to man, and his reverence to God.

[blocks in formation]
« 上一頁繼續 »