Eulereu, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1844, by HARPER & BROTHERS,

In the Clerk's Office of the Southern District of New-York

AN ADDRESS TO THE REV. EUSTACE CAREY, ON HIS DESIGNA-

TION AS A CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY TO INDIA.

A SERMON ON THE DEATH OF HER ROYAL HIGHNFSS THE

PRINCESS CHARLOTTE OF WALES

A FUNERAL SERMON FOR THE REV. DR. RYLAND

157

177

203

ON THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE INNOCENT FOR THE GUILTY. 261

The Argument from the Order of Time in which Baptism

and the Lord's Supper are supposed to have been instituted 293

SECTION II.

The Argument for Strict Communion from the Order of

Words in the Apostolic Commission, considered . . 304

SECTION III.

The Argument from Apostolical Precedent, and from the dif

ferent Significations of the two Institutions, considered

SECTION IV.

Our supposed Opposition to the Universal Suffrages of the

Church, considered

PART II.

309

316

The Positive Grounds on which we justify the Practice of

Mixed Communion

321

SECTION I.

Free Communion urged, from the Obligation of Brotherly

Love.

321

SECTION II.

The Practice of Open Communion argued, from the express

Injunction of Scripture respecting the Conduct to be main-

tained by sincere Christians who differ in their Religious

Sentiments

SECTION III.

Pedobaptists a Part of the true Church, and their Exclusion

on that account unlawful

SECTION IV.

The Exclusion of Pedobaptists from the Lord's Table con-

sidered as a Punishment.

Page

324

332

337

SECTION V.

On the Impossibility of reducing the Practice of Strict Com-

munion to any general Principle

SECTION VI.

344

The Impolicy of the Practice of Strict Communion considered 351

POSTSCRIPT

ON THE ESSENTIAL. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN BAPTISM

AND THE BAPTISM OF JOHN

Preface.

360

363

365

A REPLY TO THE REV. JOSEPH KINGHORN, BEING A FURTHER

VINDICATION OF THE PRACTICE OF FREE COMMUNION

The Fundamental Position; or, the supposed necessary

Connexion between the two positive Institutes of Chris-

tianity examined

His Attempt to establish the Connexion contended for from

the Apostolic Commission and Primitive Precedent

The supposed necessary Connexion between the two posi-

tive Institutes further discussed, wherein other Arguments

are examined

106

423

An Inquiry how far the Practice of Mixed Communion af-

fects the Grounds of Dissent from the Church of England

and from the Church of Rome.

CHAPTER VI.

443

The Propriety of appealing, in this Controversy, to the pe

culiar Principles of the Pedobaptists, briefly examined

and discussed

In which the Insufficiency of the Reply Mr. Kinghorn has

inade to the principal Arguments urged for Mixed Com-

munion is exposed

CHAPTER VII.

His Reply to the Argument deduced from the Scriptural

Injunction of Mutual Forbearance and Brotherly Love,

considered

CHAPTER VIII.

On the Argument for Mixed Communion founded on the

Pedobaptists being a part of the true Church

CHAPTER IX.

The Injustice of the Exclusion of other Denominations con-

sidered as a Punishment.

CHAPTER X.

457

457

470

474

On the Contrariety of the Maxims and Sentiments of the

Advocates of Strict Communion to those which prevailed

in the early Ages; in which the Innovation imputed to

them by the Author is vindicated from the Charge of

Misrepresentation.

481