« 上一頁繼續 »
manner- "The Confederates, a farce. By Capt. Breval (for which he was put into the Dunciad). An Epilogue to Powel's Puppet-show. By Col. Ducket (for which he was put into the Dunciad). Essays, &c. By Sir Richard Blackmore. (N. B. It was for a passage of this book that Sir Richard was put into the Dunciad.)" And so of others.
AFTER THE DUNCIAD, 1728.
An Essay on the Dunciad, octavo, printed for J. Roberts. [In this book, p. 9, it was formally declared, "That the complaint of the aforesaid libels and advertisements was forged and untrue; that all mouths had been silent, except in Mr. Pope's praise; and nothing against him published, but by Mr. Theobald."]
Sawney, in blank verse, occasioned by the Dunciad; with a Critique on that poem. By J. Ralph, [a person never mentioned in it at first, but inserted after,] printed for J. Roberts, octavo.
A complete Key to the Dunciad. By E. Curl. 12mo. price 6d.
A second and third edition of the same, with additions, 12mo.
The Popiad. By E. Curl, extracted from J. Dennis, Sir Richard Blackmore, &c. 12mo. price 6d. The Curliad. By the same E. Curl.
The Female Dunciad. Collected by the same Mr. Curl. 12mo. price 6d. With the Metamorphosis of P. into a Stinging-Nettle. By Mr. Foxton.
The Metamorphosis of Scriblerus into Snarlerus. By J. Smedley, printed for A. Moore, folio, price 6d. The Dunciad dissected. By Curl and Mrs. Thomas.
An Essay on the Taste and Writings of the present Times. Said to be writ by a gentleman of C. c. c. Oxon. Printed for J. Roberts. 8vo.
The Arts of Logic and Rhetoric, partly taken from Bouhours, with new Reflections, &c. By John Oldmixon. 8vo.
Remarks on the Dunciad. By Mr. Dennis, dedicated to Theobald. 8vo. A Supplement to the Profund. Matthew Concanen.
Mist's Weekly Journal, June 8. A long Letter, signed W. A. Writ by some or other of the Club of Theobald, Dennis, Moore, Concanen, Cooke, who for some time held constant weekly meetings for these kind of performances.
Daily Journal, June 11. A Letter signed Philoscriblerus, on the name of Pope.-Letter to Mr. Theobald, in verse, signed B. M. [Bezaleel Morris] against Mr. P. Many other little epigrams about this time in the same papers, by James Moore, and others.
Mist's Journal, June 22. A Letter by Lewis Theobald.
Flying Post, August 8. Letter on Pope and Swift. Daily Journal, August 8. Letter charging the author of the Dunciad with treason.
Durgen: a plain satire on a pompous satirist. By Edward Ward, with a little of James Moore.
Apollo's Maggot in his Cups. By E. Ward. Gulliveriana secunda. Being a collection of many of the libels in the newspapers, like the former volume, under the same title, by Smedley. Advertised in the Craftsman, Nov. 9, 1728, with this remarkable promise, that " any thing which any body should send as Mr. Pope's or Dr. Swift's, should be inserted and published as theirs."
Pope Alexander's supremacy and infallibility exa mined, &c. By George Ducket, and John Dennis. 4to.
Dean Jonathan's Paraphrase on the 4th Chapter of Genesis. Writ by E. Roome. Folio. 1729.
Labeo. A paper of verses by Leonard Welsted, which after came into one epistle, and was published by James Moore. 4to. 1730. Another part of it came out in Welsted's own name, under the just title of Dulness and Scandal. Folio. 1731.
There have been since published,
Verses on the Imitator of Horace. By a 1 Lady for between a lady, a lord, and a court-squire]. Printed for J. Roberts. Folio.
An Epistle from a Nobleman to a Doctor of Divinity, from Hampton-court [Lord Hy]. Printed for J. Roberts also. Folio.
A Letter from Mr. Cibber to Mr. Pope. for W. Lewis in Covent Garden. 8vo.
i Lady Montague.
To the FIRST EDITION with Notes, in Quarto, 1729.
IT will be sufficient to say of this edition, that the reader has here a much more correct and complete copy of the DUNCIAD, than has hitherto appeared. I cannot answer but some mistakes may have slipt into it, but a vast number of others will be prevented by the names being now not only set at length, but justified by the authorities and reasons given. I make no doubt, the author's own motive to use real rather than feigned names, was his care to preserve the innocent from any false application; whereas in the former editions, which had no more than the initial letters, he was made, by keys printed here, to hurt the inoffensive; and (what was worse) to abuse his friends, by an impression at Dublin.
The commentary which attends this poem was sent me from several hands, and consequently must be unequally written; yet will have one advantage over most commentaries, that it is not made upon conjectures, or at a remote distance of time: and the reader cannot but derive one pleasure from the very obscurity of the persons it treats of, that it partakes of the nature of a secret, which most people love to be let into, though the men or the things be ever so inconsiderable or trivial.
Of the persons it was judged proper to give some account for since it is only in this monument that
they must expect to survive, (and here survive they will, as long as the English tongue shall remain such as it was in the reigns of Queen ANNE and King GEORGE,) it seemed but humanity to bestow a word or two upon each, just to tell what he was, what he writ, when he lived, and when he died.
If a word or two more are added upon the chief offenders, 'tis only as a paper pinned upon the breast, to mark the enormities for which they suffered; lest the correction only should be remembered, and the crime forgotten.
In some articles it was thought sufficient, barely to transcribe from Jacob, Curl, and other writers of their own rank, who were much better acquainted with them than any of the authors of this comment can pretend to be. Most of them had drawn each other's characters on certain occasions; but the few here inserted are all that could be saved from the neral destruction of such works.
Of the part of Scriblerus I need say nothing; his manner is well enough known, and approved by all but those who are too much concerned to be judges.
The Imitations of the Ancients are added to gratify those who either never read, or may have forgotten them; together with some of the parodies and allusions to the most excellent of the moderns. If, from the frequency of the former, any man think the poem too much a cento, our Poet will but appear to have done the same thing in jest which Boileau did in earnest; and upon which Vida, Fracastorius, and many of the most eminent Latin poets, professedly valued themselves.