 | Joseph Chitty - 1812 - 760 頁
...B. as of C. But jlo|t 3' ^J if A. starts a hare, &c. in a forest or warren of B. and"1"1 Hac- ll1" hunts it into the ground of C. and there kills it, the pro- (;, (||,. 1..3 perty remains all the while in B. the proprietor of the),1'1- 2 P|arJ _ . Comm.... | |
 | Edward Christian - 1817 - 374 頁
...if A start a hare, &c. in a forest or warren of B, and hunt it into the ground of C, and there kill it, the property remains all the while in B, the proprietor of the warren, because the privilege continues. And these distinctions, Holt, Chief Justice, took upon the authority... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - 1831 - 542 頁
...of B as of C- But if A- starts a hare> &c- in a forest or warren of B-. in B.'i pri and hunts it in the ground of C., and there kills it, the property remains all the vate while in В., the proprietor of the warren, because the privilege continues, grounds, t Aro e.... | |
 | George Colwell Oke - 1863 - 440 頁
...trespass for hunting in the grounds of B. as of C. But if A. starts a hare, &c., in a forest or warren 5 of B. and hunts it into the ground of C., and there...all the while in B., the proprietor of the warren, because the privilege continues." Then, if A. starts a hare in his own close, and hunts it into the... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1865 - 534 頁
...290. pass for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C. But, if A. starts a hare, &c., in a forest or warren of B., and hunts it into the ground of C.,...all the while in B., the proprietor of the warren, because the privilege continues. And these distinctions Holt, CJ, took upon the authority of 12 II.... | |
 | 1865 - 422 頁
...A starts a hare in th" ground of B (whe is entitled ratume soli only, for that is plainly implied), and hunts it into the ground of C, and there kills it, the property is in the hunter : for it cannot be in B, whe is entitled rat ione soli only, and not ratione privilegii,... | |
 | 1865 - 934 頁
...starts a hare in the ground of B. (who is entitled ratione soli only, for that is plainly implied), and hunts it into the ground of C, and there kills it, the property is in the hunter; for it cannot be in B, (who is en till«! ratione soli only, and not ratione priviler/ii,)... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1866 - 570 頁
...starts a hare in the ground of B. (who is entitled ratione soli only, for that is plainly implied), and hunts it into the ground of C., and there kills it, the property is in A., the hunter," for it cannot be in B., who is entitled ratione soli only, and not ratione privilegii,... | |
 | Great Britain. Magistrates' cases - 1866 - 416 頁
...a hare in the ground of В., who is entitled ratione soli only — for that is plainly implied — and hunts it into the ground of C., and there kills it, the property is in the hunter, for it cannot be in A., who is entitled ratione soli only, and not ratione prwilegii,... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1870 - 540 頁
...in the grounds as well of B. as of C. But, if A. starts a hare, &c., in a forest or warren of В., and hunts it into the ground of C., and there kills it, the property remains all the while in В., the proprietor of the warren, because the privilege continues. And these distinctions Holt, CJ,... | |
| |
Salk. 290. pass for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C. But, if A. starts a hare, &c., in a forest or warren of B., and hunts it into the ground of C., and there kills it, the property remains all the while in B., the proprietor of the warren,... 
