 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1804 - 514 頁
...necefllty expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conffift with each •ther, the courts muft decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in oppofition to the conftitution ; if v. both the law and the conftitution apply to a particular MADIsON.... | |
 | Horace Binney, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1809 - 676 頁
...repugnant to that instrument is void." p. 180. " It is emphatically the province and duty of the judi" cial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...to particular cases, must of necessity expound and inter•' pret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts " must decide on the operation... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 486 頁
...however, receive a more attentive consideration. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. 178 *So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to... | |
 | Robert Walsh - 1827 - 674 頁
...receive a more attentive consideration. " It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...operation of each. So, if a law be in opposition to tin' Constitution ; if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1833 - 800 頁
...however, receive a more attentive consideration. "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say, what the law is. Those, who apply...the law and the constitution apply to a particular cnse ; so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution... | |
 | Robert Walsh - 1827 - 686 頁
...however, receive a more attentive consideration. "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...apply to a particular case, so that the court must decide that case, conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution; or, conformably to the Constitution,... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 頁
...receive a more attentive consideration. jit is emphatically the province and duty j>f the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with eacii other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.> So.jif a law be in opposition to the... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 550 頁
...conclusion inevitably and irresistibly follows : "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the court must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution," &c.,... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 554 頁
...emphatically the province and duty of the jndicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rale to particular cases must of necessity expound and...that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the court must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution," &c.,... | |
 | Andrew Johnson - 1868 - 532 頁
...however, receive a more attentive consideration. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply...other, the courts must decide on the operation of euch. So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply... | |
| |
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on... 
