CONTINGENT ELECTION OF THE VICE PRESIDENT BY THE SENATE
Now
Library of Congress. Legislative Reference Service January 1969
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1968 COMPARATIVE RESULTS UNDER PRESENT AND PROPOSED SYSTEMS
Alabama.. Alaska... Arizona. Arkansas. California. Colorado... Connecticut.. Delaware..... District of Columbia. Florida... Georgia... Hawaii... Idaho.. Illinois...... Indiana. lowa...... Kansas...... Kentucky.... Louisiana..... Maine........ Maryland... .............. Massachusetts Michigan... Minnesota.... Mississippi.... Missouri....... Montana.... Nebraska.... Nevada.... New Hampshir Now Jersey... Now Mexico.. Now York.... North Carolina North Dakota....
1.861 1. 280 1.751 1.819 17.895 2. 461 3. 962 1. 248 2. 454 4.330 3.245 2. 398 1. 226 11. 480 4.938 3. 673 2.430 3. 397 2. 821 2.212 4. 358 8.821 10.118 5.399 1.611 5.248 1.663 1.590 1. 178 1.757 7.474 1.589 21.395 3. 800 1.529
Source: U.S. Library of Congress, Legislative Reference Service. Calculations based on State-by-State returns described as "complete and official” and published in the New York Times, Dec. 12, 1968, and the Washington Post, Dec. 13, 1968, State-by-State returns under the district system are not yet available; the nationwide total was compiled by the Associated Press and published in the Washington Post, Nov. 28, 1968.
Library of Congress. Legislative Reference Service January 1969
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1964 COMPARATIVE RESULTS UNDER PRESENT AND PROPOSED SYSTEMS
Alabama.. Alaska...... Arizona..... Arkansas. California.... Colorado. Connecticut.. Delaware.... District of Columbia. Florida. Georgia. Hawaii. Idaho.. Illinois. Indiana
............................... lowa....... Kansas. Kentucky... Louisiana... Maine....... Maryland.... Massachusetts. Michigan.. Minnesota ..... Mississippi...... Missouri..... Montana... Nebraska.... Nevada.... New Hampshire.. New Jersey..... New Mexico..... New York........ North Carolina.... North Dakota..
44.329 237,753
314, 197 4,171, 877
476, 024 826, 269 122, 704 169, 796 948, 540 522, 557 163, 249
148, 920 2,796, 833 1, 170, 848 733, 030 464, 028 669, 659 387,068 262, 264
730, 912 1.786, 422 2, 136, 615 991, 117
52, 618 1,164, 344
164, 246 307, 307 79, 339
184,064 1,867, 671
194,015 4,913, 156
800, 139
149, 784 2, 498,331
519, 834
1.977 2. 472 3. 363 23.644
3.675 5. 424 1. 828 2. 564 7. 160 5. 503 3. 150 2. 036 15. 462 7.277 5.569 3.786 5. 761 4.318 2.753 6.547 10.666 14.007 6.375
903 7.685 2.357 2.630 1.755 2.554 11.153
2.361 29.480 7. 299 2.318 16. 365 4. 459
ONDAWoo vow wowwwwoonwi VaRangowaan:
Oregon.... Pennsylvania. Rhode Island. South Carolina. South Dakota.. Tennessee.. Texas.... Utah..... Vermont.... Virginia... Washington. West Virginia. Wisconsin... Wyoming
Total....
4.711 1.775 4.893 9. 122 1. 811 1.010 5.541 3. 364 2. 244 4.528 1.303
1 Democratic electors in Alabama were not pledged to Johnson, Their popular vote came to 210,733. Including this unpledged Alabama vote, other candidated received 336,697 votes, equivalent to 3.942 electoral votes.
Source: ''Reform of the electoral college?" The Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government. Richmond, Va., 1966, pp. 96-98. The table was prepared by Neal Peirce, political editor, Congressional Quarterly
« 上一頁繼續 » |