 ... for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier...  Reports of Cases Determined in the Appellate Courts of Illinois - 第 16 頁Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith 著 - 1912完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 頁
...resulting from the negligence of the interstate carrier by railroad, shall be "for the benefit o£ the surviving widow or husband and children of such...of the next of kin dependent upon such, employe," it expressly limits the right of recovery by the personal representative to the ibeneficiaries named,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 頁
...any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any. of said jurisdictions, * * * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier. * * *" "SEC. 3. That in all actions hereafter brought against... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 頁
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." US Comp. Stat. 1913,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1917 - 780 頁
...husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, James Sanders Guignard Richardson (Reporter), Robert Wallace Shand (Reporter), Cyprian Melanchton Efird (Reporter), William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray (Reporter), William Munro Shand (Reporter) - 1917 - 650 頁
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." No change was made... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 頁
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much... | |
 | 1920 - 496 頁
...given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." This amendment merely provides... | |
 | 1917 - 498 頁
...given by this Act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband...such employe's parents ; and, if none, then of The construction of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, in its essentials, follows the construction given... | |
 | 1917 - 510 頁
...surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parent; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe." In this respect the act of 1910 differs from the Arkansas statute construed in Davis v. Railway Co.,40... | |
 | 1926 - 1144 頁
...person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any of said jurisdictions, * • * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence,... | |
| |
